Publications

Request History

No previous requests logged.

Session

• 0(null)

Request

Cake Params

• plugin(null)
• controllerpublications
• actionindex
• named(empty)
• pass(empty)
• localeen
• paging(array)
  • Publication(array)
    • page60
    • current7
    • count612
    • prevPage(true)
    • nextPage(true)
    • pageCount88
    • order(array)
      • Publication.publication_datedesc
    • limit7
    • options(array)
      • page60
    • paramTypequerystring
    • queryScope(null)

Post data

No post data.

Query string

• page60

Cookie

To view Cookies, add CookieComponent to Controller

Current Route

• name(null)
• _fields(empty)
• resourceActionindex
• modelPublication
• keys(array)
  • 0locale
• options(array)
  • pass(empty)
• defaults(array)
  • controllerpublications
  • actionindex
  • plugin(null)
• template/:locale/publications
• config(empty)

Sql Logs

Logs

View Variables

• menuNameCurrentMenuLinkmain
• title_for_layoutPublications
• publications(array)
  • 0(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1545
      • created2016-04-04 18:38:13
      • modified2016-04-25 17:59:10
      • publication_date2009-10-01 00:00:00
      • first_nameGerard
      • last_nameCOFFEY
      • occupationMember
      • institutionUniversity of Limerick
      • addressCastletroy, Co.
      • postal_codeV94 T9PX
      • countryIreland
      • telephone
      • fax
      • emailger.coffey@ul.ie
      • titleCodifying the meaning of 'intention' in the criminal law
      • authorGerard COFFEY
      • co_author
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisherJournal of Criminal Law, Volume 73, Issue 5
      • pages394-413
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">What constitutes an intention to conmit a criminal offence has proven to be a notoriously difficult concept to define. The issue as to whether the accused intended the consequences of the prohibited act or omission constituting the criminal offence charged in the indictment is a question of fact for the jury to determine based on the evidence tendered at trial in addition to the trial judge's charge to the jury. In the absence of a clear statutory definition of intention in the criminal law it is imperative for trial judges to instruct juries in accordance with clear judicial guidelines. However, the jurisprudence of the English and Irish superior courts pertaining to the meaning of intention, and in particular indirect or oblique intention, has generally been regarded as unsatisfactory with the result that trial judges have insufficient guidelines when instructing juries.  This comment evaluates the jurisprudence of the superior courts on the meaning of intention in the criminal law. It suggests that the guidelines formulated by the superior courts hitherto are not definitive and may lead to confusion when trial judges instruct juries on the meaning of intention, thus necessitating statutory reform.</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywordsMens rea; Purpose intent; Foresight intent; Human rights; Statutory modification
      • slugcodifying-the-meaning-of-intention-in-the-criminal-law
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameGerard COFFEY
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 1(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1109
      • created2012-08-02 00:00:00
      • modified2015-11-17 11:45:47
      • publication_date2009-10-01 00:00:00
      • first_nameJaan
      • last_nameGINTER
      • occupationContact Point
      • institutionUniversity of Tartu
      • addressNäituse 20, Tartu
      • postal_code50409
      • countryEE
      • telephone+372 7375391
      • fax
      • emailJaan.Ginter@ut.ee
      • titleCriminal liability of legal persons in Estonia - a working system still subject to improvement
      • authorJaan GINTER
      • co_author
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisherJuridica International, 2009 XVI
      • pages151-156
      • abstractEstonia introduced criminal liability of legal persons with the adoption of the new Penal Code of 2002.<br /> The Estonian courts and public prosecutors have applied the provisions extensively, but so far the topic has attracted the attention of only a few legal scholars. The purpose of this article is to fill in this academic gap.<br /> <br />  
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords(null)
      • slugcriminal-liability-of-legal-persons-in-estonia-a-working-system-still-subject-to-improvement
      • attachment_id1596
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id1269
      • full_nameJaan GINTER
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id1596
      • nameji_2009_1_151.pdf
      • extensionpdf
      • filenameji_2009_1_151
      • mimetypeapplication/pdf
      • md5c593b2ee012b981d0d2744395aad7c91
      • typedocument
      • size220882
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(false)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created2015-10-26 18:53:11
      • modified2015-10-26 18:53:11
      • title
      • online(true)
  • 2(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id934
      • created2012-07-20 00:00:00
      • modified2016-04-16 15:46:02
      • publication_date2009-10-01 00:00:00
      • first_nameAndre
      • last_nameKLIP
      • occupationMember
      • institutionMaastricht University
      • addressP.O. Box 616
      • postal_code6200 MD Maastric
      • countryThe Netherlands
      • telephone0031 43 3883139
      • fax
      • emailandre.klip@strafr.unimaas.nl
      • titleAn additional evaluation mechanism in the field of EU judicial cooperation in criminal matters to strenghten mutual trust
      • authorAndre KLIP
      • co_authorMarlen DANE (Eds.)
      • publication_typebook
      • journal_publisherCelsus
      • pages330
      • abstractOn the 2nd and 3rd of June 2009, the conference on Monitoring and evaluation mechanisms in the field of EU judicial cooperation in criminal matters was held at the Faculty of Law, Maastricht University. This conference, which was organized jointly by the Maastricht University and the Ministry of Justice of the Netherlands, brought together experts of a diverse range of subjects, including (European) criminal law, political science and human rights law. Present were representatives from eighteen different EU Member States, academics from all over Europe and representatives from several EU institutions and other international organisations, such as the World Bank and the Council of Europe. This book must be partly seen as the conference papers of the June 2009 Maastricht conference. It contains the elaborated versions of the speakers’ interventions. For the other part it contains the two studies commissioned by the Ministry of Justice in preparation of the conference. The first results of the project were presented during the Conference. In this book the final reports are included, whereby the results of the conference are taken into account as well.
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords
      • slugan-additional-evaluation-mechanism-in-the-field-of-eu-judicial-cooperation-in-criminal-matters-to-strenghten-mutual-trust
      • attachment_id2019
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id1090
      • full_nameAndre KLIP
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id2019
      • nameblob.
      • extension
      • filenameblob
      • mimetypeimage/png
      • md59577991e7a7537ad376040e631e9551c
      • typeimage
      • size45835
      • width453
      • height127
      • protected(false)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created2016-04-08 11:31:44
      • modified2016-04-08 11:31:44
      • title
      • online(true)
  • 3(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1507
      • created2016-04-02 11:05:32
      • modified2016-04-24 22:42:56
      • publication_date2009-10-01 00:00:00
      • first_nameLorena
      • last_nameBACHMAIER-WINTER
      • occupationMember
      • institutionComplutense University of Madrid
      • addressCdad. Universitaria
      • postal_code75120
      • countrySpain
      • telephone0034 913945798
      • fax
      • emaill.bachmaier@der.ucm.es
      • titleShort remarks on the European enforcement order for uncontested claims: a Spanish perspective
      • authorLorena BACHMAIER-WINTER in Bernd OPPERMANN (Ed.), " International legal studies: by European scholars of the ELPIS network"
      • co_author
      • publication_typebook_chapter
      • journal_publisherUniversitätsverlag Halle-Wittenberg
      • pages89-107
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">The International Legal Studies (ILeS) of European scholars being collected in the present edition are developed versions of lectures in three languages given at academic occasions of the ELPIS university network between 2006 and 2009. Most of these valuable contributions were donated to a European academic audience in the frame of the annual ELPIS European Masters graduation ceremony. A famous entree of a French legal historian on European harmonisation in the context of internationalisation is provided by Prof. Argyriadis-Kervegan. Prof. Guillet, also from Le Havre, catches up on the fascinating debate of French Laicism controversially. The subject of globalisation and internationalisation of law serves Prof. Girard, Rouen, to develop some remarkable thoughts on the debate of scientific method(s) of legal comparison. The subject is taken up again and transformed by Prof. Xu, Shanghai, who develops his thoughts on the reaction of the Chinese legal system on challenges in respect of external affairs. The two articles of the Portuguese scholar Prof. Vasco Pereira da Silva on the subject of Europeanization of public and administrative law enable a multi-dimensional view on the subject matter. Problems of procedural law and contract law in the frame of arbitration clauses are treated by Prof. Schwartze, Innsbruck, and attractively resolved in close reference to European jurisdiction. Prof. Bachmaier Winter, Madrid, devotes her concentrated attention to the European enforcement order for uncontested claims in relation to national modes. Prof. Fenge, Hanover, opens a fascinating academic view on the source quality of judge-made law which appears to be a specific problem in the Europe of different legal traditions. The need for legal certainty within the European Union transforms this very subject into a matter of consistent interpretation, controversially debated by Prof. Oppermann, Hanover.<br />  </p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords
      • slugshort-remarks-on-the-european-enforcement-order-for-uncontested-claims-a-spanish-perspective
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameLorena BACHMAIER-WINTER
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 4(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id480
      • created2006-04-05 00:00:00
      • modified2015-11-17 11:45:47
      • publication_date2009-09-14 00:00:00
      • first_namePedro
      • last_nameCAEIRO
      • occupationManagement Committee
      • institutionUniversity of Coimbra
      • addressFaculdade de Direito, Pátio da Universidade
      • postal_code3004-545 Coimbra
      • countryPT
      • telephone+351.239.859802
      • fax
      • emailpcaeiro@fd.uc.pt
      • titleConcluding remarks
      • authorPedro CAEIRO in Francesca GALLI and Anne WEYEMBERGH (Eds.), "EU counter-terrorism offences: what impact on national legislation and case-law?"
      • co_author
      • publication_typebook_chapter
      • journal_publisherÉditions de l'Université Libre de Bruxelles
      • pages305-312
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">Governments have often claimed that modern international terrorism cannot be handled adequately within the ordinary criminal justice system. Consequently criminal law had to be adapted to fight terrorism more effectively, which includes the criminalization of certain “abstract danger”, preparatory activities such as terrorist training, membership in a terrorist organization etc. </p> <p style="text-align: justify;"></p> <p style="text-align: justify;">National legislation has evolved against the background of international and European instruments. This collective book presents and discusses the latest counter-terrorism policies at the EU level, and particularly instruments for approximation in the field, namely the Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism and the Framework Decision 2008/919/JHA amending the previous one. The objective is, in particular, to evaluate the impact of the introduction of a EU definition of terrorism and the three new offences of provocation, training and recruitment for terrorism purposes on the development of substantive criminal law and case law of selected EU Member States.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">Following an introduction and a general critical assessment of both Framework Decisions, the first part will be devoted to the interplay between these two EU instruments and national provisions, including a study of the relevant domestic case law. Nine Member States (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK, Austria, Belgium, Denmark and Hungary) have been selected in order to ensure a balanced representation and particularly the division between two groups of States. The first group is made of few jurisdictions that have experienced serious and long-lasting periods of political violence and terrorism, developed specific terrorist offences and have been influential in providing a model for shaping a common European counter-terrorism strategy. The second group encompasses States that have defined terrorist offences as autonomous ones in their penal codes only when required by the 2002 Framework Decision on combating terrorism. A second and briefer part looks at the influence on European cooperation of the two relevant EU framework decisions harmonizing the terrorist offences. A third and last part is entirely dedicated to the issue of the shift towards prevention in the fight against terrorism and gathers several crosscutting reports for this purpose. The book ends with a transversal and analytical conclusion by Pedro Caeiro.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">This book is the result of the collaboration of an international team composed of academics and researchers who are members of ECLAN (European Criminal Law Academic Network) as well as national and European experts who « practice » the relevant EU instruments on a regular basis.</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywordsterrorism,counterterrorism
      • slugconcluding-remarks
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id562
      • full_namePedro CAEIRO
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 5(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id868
      • created2009-09-15 00:00:00
      • modified2015-11-17 11:45:47
      • publication_date2009-09-01 00:00:00
      • first_nameValsamis
      • last_nameMITSILEGAS
      • occupationCoordinator
      • institutionQueen Mary University
      • addressMile End Road 339
      • postal_codeE1 4NS
      • countryGB
      • telephone+44(0) 2078825132
      • fax+44(0)2089818733
      • emailv.mitsilegas@qmul.ac.uk
      • titleThe third wave of third pillar law: which direction for EU criminal justice?
      • authorValsamis MITSILEGAS
      • co_author
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisherEuropean Law Review, Vol. 34, No. 4
      • pages523-560
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">After a period of relative stagnation, the past few months witnessed the adoption of a plethora of legislative instruments under the third pillar. These instruments can be seen as the third wave of third-pillar law, following the first wave of measures adopted post-Maastricht and the second wave of measures adopted post-Amsterdam and Tampere. The third wave of third-pillar law extends to most major areas of European integration in criminal law. New legislation involves the harmonisation of substantive criminal law (including the fields of terrorism, organised crime and racism and xenophobia), mutual recognition (with measures such as the European Evidence Warrant and legislation on the recognition of probation decisions and the transfer of sentenced persons), the work of EU criminal justice bodies such as Europol and Eurojust, and the development of standards to regulate the proliferation of third pillar mechanisms to collect, analyse and exchange personal data. By analysing the background and content of these instruments, this article will assess their impact on the future development of EU criminal law and justice.</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords(null)
      • slugthe-third-wave-of-third-pillar-law-which-direction-for-eu-criminal-justice
      • attachment_id1582
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id992
      • full_nameValsamis MITSILEGAS
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id1582
      • nameiii_pillar.pdf
      • extensionpdf
      • filenameiii_pillar
      • mimetypeapplication/pdf
      • md54bde7addf2f045e89334363eda4d6adf
      • typedocument
      • size307738
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(false)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created2015-10-22 13:09:37
      • modified2015-10-22 13:09:37
      • title
      • online(true)
  • 6(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1143
      • created2012-08-03 00:00:00
      • modified2015-11-26 12:38:52
      • publication_date2009-09-01 00:00:00
      • first_namePaul
      • last_nameDE HERT
      • occupationContact Point
      • institutionVrije Univesiteit Brussel
      • addressPleinelaan 2
      • postal_code1050
      • countryBE
      • telephone+32(0)2 629 24 60
      • fax+32(0)2 629 36 33
      • emailpaul.de.hert@vub.ac.be
      • titleThe PNR Agreement and Transatlantic anti-terrorism Cooperation: No firm human rights framework on either side of the Atlantic.
      • authorPaul DE HERT
      • co_authorVagelis PAPAKONSTANTINOU
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisherCommon Market Law Review (3) 46
      • pages885-919
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">Seamless air commuting between the EU and the USA appears to constitute nowadays a much sought-after but nevertheless still elusive cause. The level of co operation between the two parties has had, and is still having, its best and worst days. The protection of individual privacy continues to constitute one of the causes for much controversy. In Europe, the formal recognition of a right to data protection, in addition to the right to privacy, has led to an elaborate framework for the protection of individuals; however, internal, institutional difficulties have frequently caused confusion as to the appropriate legal treatment of different situations. In the USA individual privacy and personal data are protected through a mixture of sources: Constitutional law, Supreme Court case law, federal legislation, sector-specific legislation, etc. The difference in approach is obvious and has fed European belief about having higher standards in protection of personal data. After 9/11, the request of American security authorities to have increased access to the personal data of passengers (PNR data) visiting the USA, inevitably led to yet another confrontation of the two systems. The conflict was attempted to be resolved by a First (2004) PNR Agreement, that was annulled by the European Court of Justice, then by an Interim PNR Agreement and, finally, by the, in effect, Second (2007) PNR Agreement. The paper attempts to bring forward the route to the conclusion of the PNR Agreements, as well as to asses the effectiveness of the policy choices and the PNR Agreement model itself for the protection of individual privacy.</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywordsdata protection,privacy,US
      • slugthe-pnr-agreement-and-transatlantic-anti-terrorism-cooperation-no-firm-human-rights-framework-on-either-side-of-the-atlantic
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id1303
      • full_namePaul DE HERT
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
• query(array)
  • page60
• meta(array)
  • titlePublications
• $request->data(empty)
• $this->validationErrors(array)
  • Menu(empty)
  • MenuLink(empty)
  • MenuLinkTranslation(empty)
  • AcademicProject(empty)
  • SearchDocument(empty)
  • Page(empty)
  • PageTranslation(empty)
  • EuLegislatoryDocument(empty)
  • PhdDocument(empty)
  • Newsletter(empty)
  • NewsletterTranslation(empty)
  • EuCaseLawDocument(empty)
  • Member(empty)
  • Event(empty)
  • EventTranslation(empty)
  • Publication(empty)
  • Link(empty)
  • LinkTranslation(empty)
  • Attachment(empty)
  • AttachmentTranslation(empty)
• Loaded Helpers(array)
  • 0Asset
  • 1Attachment
  • 2Html
  • 3Share
  • 4Form
  • 5Paginator
  • 6CookiesWarning
  • 7EventDates
  • 8Website
  • 9FormCrypt
  • 10Number
  • 11SimpleGraph
  • 12Menus
  • 13DebugTimer
  • 14Toolbar
  • 15Text
  • 16HtmlToolbar

App Constants

CakePHP Constants

PHP Environment

Included Files

Include Paths

• 1/usr/share/php
• 2-> /var/web/vd13792/ulb008_releases/20220919065337/cakephp/lib/Cake/

Included Files

• core(array)
  • Behavior(array)
    • 0CORE/Model/Behavior/ContainableBehavior.php
  • Cache(array)
    • 0CORE/Cache/Cache.php
    • 1CORE/Cache/Engine/FileEngine.php
    • 2CORE/Cache/CacheEngine.php
  • Component(array)
    • 0CORE/Controller/Component/PaginatorComponent.php
    • 1CORE/Controller/Component/SessionComponent.php
  • Config(array)
    • 0CORE/Config/config.php
  • Configure(array)
    • 0CORE/Configure/PhpReader.php
    • 1CORE/Configure/ConfigReaderInterface.php
  • Controller(array)
    • 0CORE/Controller/Controller.php
    • 1CORE/Controller/ComponentCollection.php
    • 2CORE/Controller/Component.php
  • Datasource(array)
    • 0CORE/Model/Datasource/CakeSession.php
    • 1CORE/Model/Datasource/Database/Mysql.php
    • 2CORE/Model/Datasource/DboSource.php
    • 3CORE/Model/Datasource/DataSource.php
  • Error(array)
    • 0CORE/Error/exceptions.php
    • 1CORE/Error/ErrorHandler.php
  • I18n(array)
    • 0CORE/I18n/I18n.php
    • 1CORE/I18n/L10n.php
  • Log(array)
    • 0CORE/Log/CakeLog.php
    • 1CORE/Log/LogEngineCollection.php
    • 2CORE/Log/Engine/FileLog.php
    • 3CORE/Log/Engine/BaseLog.php
    • 4CORE/Log/CakeLogInterface.php
  • Model(array)
    • 0CORE/Model/Model.php
    • 1CORE/Model/BehaviorCollection.php
    • 2CORE/Model/ConnectionManager.php
    • 3CORE/Model/ModelBehavior.php
  • Network(array)
    • 0CORE/Network/CakeRequest.php
    • 1CORE/Network/CakeResponse.php
  • Other(array)
    • 0CORE/bootstrap.php
    • 1CORE/basics.php
    • 2CORE/Core/App.php
    • 3CORE/Core/Configure.php
    • 4CORE/Core/CakePlugin.php
    • 5CORE/Event/CakeEventManager.php
    • 6CORE/Event/CakeEventListener.php
    • 7CORE/Event/CakeEvent.php
    • 8CORE/Core/CakeObject.php
  • Routing(array)
    • 0CORE/Routing/Dispatcher.php
    • 1CORE/Routing/Filter/AssetDispatcher.php
    • 2CORE/Routing/DispatcherFilter.php
    • 3CORE/Routing/Filter/CacheDispatcher.php
    • 4CORE/Routing/Router.php
    • 5CORE/Routing/Route/CakeRoute.php
  • Utility(array)
    • 0CORE/Utility/Hash.php
    • 1CORE/Utility/Debugger.php
    • 2CORE/Utility/CakeText.php
    • 3CORE/Utility/Inflector.php
    • 4CORE/Utility/ObjectCollection.php
    • 5CORE/Utility/ClassRegistry.php
  • View(array)
    • 0CORE/View/HelperCollection.php
• app(array)
  • Behavior(array)
    • 0APP/Model/Behavior/CachableBehavior.php
  • Config(array)
    • 0APP/Config/core.php
    • 1APP/Config/preview/bootstrap.php
    • 2APP/Config/bootstrap.php
    • 3APP/Config/languages.php
    • 4APP/Config/routes.php
    • 5APP/Config/database.php
    • 6APP/Config/preview/database.php
  • Controller(array)
    • 0APP/Controller/PublicationsController.php
    • 1APP/Controller/AppController.php
  • Model(array)
    • 0APP/Model/Menu.php
    • 1APP/Model/MenuLink.php
    • 2APP/Model/MenuLinkTranslation.php
    • 3APP/Model/AcademicProject.php
    • 4APP/Model/AppModel.php
    • 5APP/Model/Page.php
    • 6APP/Model/PageTranslation.php
    • 7APP/Model/EuLegislatoryDocument.php
    • 8APP/Model/PhdDocument.php
    • 9APP/Model/Newsletter.php
    • 10APP/Model/NewsletterTranslation.php
    • 11APP/Model/EuCaseLawDocument.php
    • 12APP/Model/Member.php
    • 13APP/Model/Event.php
    • 14APP/Model/EventTranslation.php
    • 15APP/Model/Publication.php
    • 16APP/Model/Link.php
    • 17APP/Model/LinkTranslation.php
    • 18APP/Model/Attachment.php
    • 19APP/Model/AttachmentTranslation.php
  • Other(array)
    • 0APP/mysqli-overwrites.php
    • 1APP/Entity/AppEntity.php
    • 2APP/Entity/EventEntity.php
• plugins(array)
  • BoostCake(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0BoostCake/Config/bootstrap.php
    • Component(array)
      • 0BoostCake/Controller/Component/BoostCakeComponent.php
  • CakeAdmin(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0CakeAdmin/Config/routes.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0CakeAdmin/Lib/Routing/Route/AdminRoute.php
      • 1CakeAdmin/Lib/AdminConfig.php
      • 2CakeAdmin/Lib/Routing/Route/AdminBelongsToRoute.php
  • Contact(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Contact/Config/routes.php
  • DebugKit(array)
    • Component(array)
      • 0DebugKit/Controller/Component/ToolbarComponent.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0DebugKit/Lib/DebugMemory.php
      • 1DebugKit/Lib/Panel/HistoryPanel.php
      • 2DebugKit/Lib/DebugPanel.php
      • 3DebugKit/Lib/Panel/SessionPanel.php
      • 4DebugKit/Lib/Panel/RequestPanel.php
      • 5DebugKit/Lib/Panel/SqlLogPanel.php
      • 6DebugKit/Lib/Panel/TimerPanel.php
      • 7DebugKit/Lib/Panel/LogPanel.php
      • 8DebugKit/Lib/Log/Engine/DebugKitLog.php
      • 9DebugKit/Lib/Panel/VariablesPanel.php
      • 10DebugKit/Lib/Panel/EnvironmentPanel.php
      • 11DebugKit/Lib/Panel/IncludePanel.php
      • 12DebugKit/Lib/DebugTimer.php
      • 13DebugKit/Lib/DebugKitDebugger.php
  • Event(array)
    • Model(array)
      • 0Event/Model/PluginEvent.php
      • 1Event/Model/EventAppModel.php
      • 2Event/Model/PluginEventTranslation.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Event/Entity/PluginEventEntity.php
  • MailingService(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0MailingService/Config/routes.php
  • Media(array)
    • Component(array)
      • 0Media/Controller/Component/UploadComponent.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0Media/Model/PluginAttachment.php
      • 1Media/Model/PluginAttachmentTranslation.php
      • 2Media/Model/MediaAppModel.php
  • Menu(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Menu/Config/bootstrap.php
    • Component(array)
      • 0Menu/Controller/Component/MenusComponent.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0Menu/Model/PluginMenu.php
      • 1Menu/Model/MenuAppModel.php
      • 2Menu/Model/PluginMenuLink.php
      • 3Menu/Model/PluginMenuLinkTranslation.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Menu/Lib/Tree.php
      • 1Menu/Lib/Vertex.php
  • Page(array)
    • Model(array)
      • 0Page/Model/PluginPage.php
      • 1Page/Model/PluginPageTranslation.php
  • Search(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Search/Config/routes.php
    • Behavior(array)
      • 0Search/Model/Behavior/SearchableBehavior.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0Search/Model/SearchDocument.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Search/Vendor/DoubleMetaPhone.php
  • Share(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Share/Config/routes.php
  • System(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0System/Config/bootstrap.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0System/Lib/I18n/Language.php
      • 1System/Lib/Routing/Resources.php
      • 2System/Lib/Routing/Route/I18nResourceRoute.php
      • 3System/Lib/Routing/Route/ResourceRoute.php
      • 4System/Entity/Entity.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0System/Model/EntityModel.php
    • Behavior(array)
      • 0System/Model/Behavior/TranslatableBehavior.php
      • 1System/Model/Behavior/ViewsBehavior.php
      • 2System/Model/Behavior/SluggableBehavior.php
  • Utils(array)
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Utils/Lib/Routing/Filter/MaintenanceFilter.php
    • Component(array)
      • 0Utils/Controller/Component/FormCryptComponent.php
    • Behavior(array)
      • 0Utils/Model/Behavior/ArchivableBehavior.php