Publications

Request History

No previous requests logged.

Session

• 0(null)

Request

Cake Params

• plugin(null)
• controllerpublications
• actionindex
• named(empty)
• pass(empty)
• localeen
• paging(array)
  • Publication(array)
    • page59
    • current7
    • count612
    • prevPage(true)
    • nextPage(true)
    • pageCount88
    • order(array)
      • Publication.publication_datedesc
    • limit7
    • options(array)
      • page59
    • paramTypequerystring
    • queryScope(null)

Post data

No post data.

Query string

• page59

Cookie

To view Cookies, add CookieComponent to Controller

Current Route

• name(null)
• _fields(empty)
• resourceActionindex
• modelPublication
• keys(array)
  • 0locale
• options(array)
  • pass(empty)
• defaults(array)
  • controllerpublications
  • actionindex
  • plugin(null)
• template/:locale/publications
• config(empty)

Sql Logs

Logs

View Variables

• menuNameCurrentMenuLinkmain
• title_for_layoutPublications
• publications(array)
  • 0(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1740
      • created2016-04-24 00:49:30
      • modified2016-04-24 00:49:34
      • publication_date2010-01-04 00:00:00
      • first_nameLiljana
      • last_nameSELINSEK
      • occupationMember
      • institutionMinistry of Justice of Republic of Slovenia
      • addressŽupančičeva ulica 3
      • postal_codeSI-1000, Ljublja
      • countrySlovenia
      • telephone00386 31736687
      • fax
      • emailliljana.selinsek@gov.si
      • titleElectronic evidence in the Slovene Criminal Procedure Act
      • authorLiljana SELINSEK
      • co_author
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisher Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, Volume 7
      • pages77-86
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">In October 2009, the Slovene legislator adopted an Act Amending the Criminal Procedure Act (CPA-J). With this law, two new articles entered the Criminal Procedure Act: article No. 219.a and article No. 223.a. Both articles regulate basic standards (guidelines) for the collection of electronic evidence for criminal proceedings, and are based on the fact that in the great majority of cases, it isnot the electronic device that is crucial, but the data stored in or on it.</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords
      • slugelectronic-evidence-in-the-slovene-criminal-procedure-act
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameLiljana SELINSEK
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 1(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1532
      • created2016-04-04 15:22:56
      • modified2016-04-25 17:30:34
      • publication_date2010-01-04 00:00:00
      • first_nameMatthias J.
      • last_nameBORGERS
      • occupationMember
      • institutionVU University Amsterdam
      • addressDe Boelelaan 1105
      • postal_code1081 HV
      • countryThe Netherlands
      • telephone0031 20 5986231
      • fax0031 20 5986230
      • emailm.j.borgers@rechten.vu.nl
      • titleMutual recognition and the European Court of Justice: The meaning of consistent interpretation and autonomous and uniform interpretation of Union law for the development of the principle of mutual recognition in criminal matters
      • authorMatthias J. BORGERS
      • co_author
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisherEuropean Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminology, Volume 18, Issue 2
      • pages99-114
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">Since the Tampere European Council, now ten years ago, hard work has been done within the third pillar of the European Union (EU) on innovation or, rather, streamlining of the legal assistance relationships between the Member States. This process is being completed along two lines. First of all, the traditional legal assistance system, in which States render legal assistance on request, has been transformed into a system of mutual recognition. The idea behind the principle of mutual recognition is that the European Member States are to a great extent required to render assistance to one another. This means that – ideally – few or no grounds for refusal may exist. This is partly intended to allow the necessary procedures to be standardised and run quickly. The second innovation is closely connected with this: within the EU, legal assistance is arranged mainly by means of framework decisions. A framework decision – in view of its definition in Article 34(2)(b) of the EU Treaty – gives rise to the obligation for the Member States to adjust their national legislation in accordance with the contents of the framework decision. Cooperation between the Member States based on the principle of mutual recognition is realised primarily through harmonisation of legislation. Since the Tampere European Council, now ten years ago, hard work has been done within the third pillar of the European Union (EU) on innovation or, rather, streamlining of the legal assistance relationships between the Member States. This process is being completed along two lines. First of all, the traditional legal assistance system, in which States render legal assistance on request, has been transformed into a system of mutual recognition. The idea behind the principle of mutual recognition is that the European Member States are to a great extent required to render assistance to one another. This means that – ideally – few or no grounds for refusal may exist. This is partly intended to allow the necessary procedures to be standardised and run quickly. The second innovation is closely connected with this: within the EU, legal assistance is arranged mainly by means of framework decisions. A framework decision – in view of its definition in Article 34(2)(b) of the EU Treaty – gives rise to the obligation for the Member States to adjust their national legislation in accordance with the contents of the framework decision. Cooperation between the Member States based on the principle of mutual recognition is realised primarily through harmonisation of legislation.</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords
      • slugmutual-recognition-and-the-european-court-of-justice-the-meaning-of-consistent-interpretation-and-autonomous-and-uniform-interpretation-of-union-law-for-the-development-of-the-principle-of-mutual-recognition-in-criminal-matters
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameMatthias J. BORGERS
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 2(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id999
      • created2012-07-31 00:00:00
      • modified2015-11-17 11:45:47
      • publication_date2009-12-20 00:00:00
      • first_nameValsamis
      • last_nameMITSILEGAS
      • occupationCoordinator
      • institutionQueen Mary University
      • addressMile End Road 339
      • postal_codeE1 4NS
      • countryGB
      • telephone+44(0) 2078825132
      • fax+44(0)2089818733
      • emailv.mitsilegas@qmul.ac.uk
      • titleThe European Union and the Globalisation of Criminal Law
      • authorValsamis MITSILEGAS
      • co_author
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisherCambridge yearbook of European legal studies 12/2009
      • pages337-407
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">In the new post-Cold War security era, there is a perception that the nature of cross-border security threats has changed. The need to respond to these new threats has led to a proliferation of multilateral international and regional treaties in this area, as well as unilateral demands made by the United States post-9/11. We have, then, seen a process of globalisation of criminal law, a field traditionally linked to State sovereignty. This chapter examines, first, EU action with regard to UN multilateral conventions and the impact of those conventions on internal EU law, as well as the impact of EU action within the framework of the regional treaties of the Council of Europe; secondly, the interrelationship between Union law and the global production of norms in criminal matters by the UN Security Council and by the Financial Action Task Force; thirdly, bilateral cooperation between the EU and the US, in particular in connection with the transfer of Passenger Name Records data; fourthly, the question of compliance by the EU in this area, in both the internal and the external context; and, fifthly, the Court of Justice's approach to the protection of fundamental rights when global criminal law is engaged. The EU has managed to take centre stage in international developments in the field of global criminal law through a clear commitment to multilateral negotiations as well as a clear political will to implement at the Union level norms agreed internationally without a high degree of transparency. The Court of Justice has also been reluctant to overturn Union security decisions in the name of fundamental rights. The coming into force of the Lisbon Treaty will eliminate some complexity in this area, but not all, and it still remains to be seen whether in the process of globalisation of criminal law the European values proclaimed in Article 2 of the new EU Treaty will be promoted or compromised.</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords(null)
      • slugthe-european-union-and-the-globalisation-of-criminal-law
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id1157
      • full_nameValsamis MITSILEGAS
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 3(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1165
      • created2013-09-09 00:00:00
      • modified2015-11-17 11:45:47
      • publication_date2009-12-01 00:00:00
      • first_nameMarta
      • last_nameMUÑOZ DE MORALES ROMERO
      • occupationContact Point
      • institutionUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha
      • addressAltagracia 50
      • postal_code13071
      • countryES
      • telephone0034926295300 ext. 6849
      • fax
      • emailmarta.mmorales@uclm.es
      • titleFrom Nothing to having it all? The Importation of Identity Theft by the UE
      • authorMarta MUÑOZ DE MORALES ROMERO
      • co_author
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisherCahiers de Défense Sociale, n° 36
      • pages51-61
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">The basic purpose of this article is  to analyze the evolution of this criminal offence in a specific supranational organization, the European Union, from its most remote origins up to the present day (II.), in order to go on to examine the legal instruments established in the constitutive Treaties that would make it feasible in the future to intervene in the field of criminal law, in order to harmonize this criminal offence throughout EU territory (III).</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords(null)
      • slugfrom-nothing-to-having-it-all-the-importation-of-identity-theft-by-the-ue
      • attachment_id1608
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id1336
      • full_nameMarta MUÑOZ DE MORALES ROMERO
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id1608
      • nameEDICION_CAHIERS.pdf
      • extensionpdf
      • filenameEDICION_CAHIERS
      • mimetypeapplication/pdf
      • md54499c8f6dc0e4dba80f01aff7f40af48
      • typedocument
      • size7535588
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(false)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created2015-10-27 13:42:27
      • modified2015-10-27 13:42:27
      • title
      • online(true)
  • 4(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1513
      • created2016-04-02 11:37:58
      • modified2016-04-08 12:53:44
      • publication_date2009-12-01 00:00:00
      • first_nameEstella
      • last_nameBAKER
      • occupationMember
      • institutionDe Montfort University
      • addressThe Gateway, Leicester
      • postal_codeLE1 9BH
      • countryUnited Kingdom
      • telephone0044 116 257 7256
      • fax
      • emailebaker@dmu.ac.uk
      • titleThe European Union's "Area of Freedom, Security and (Criminal) Justice" ten years on
      • authorEstella BAKER
      • co_author
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisherCriminal Law Review, Volume 12
      • pages833-850
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Roboto, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">Ten years ago it became a formal objective of the European Union to transform itself into an "Area of Freedom, Security and Justice". As the second five-year programme to turn that objective into reality nears its end, this article surveys the Area's criminal law dimension in the context of broader trends and the prospect of future developments in this sensitive area of integration.</span></p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords
      • slugthe-european-union-s-area-of-freedom-security-and-criminal-justice-ten-years-on
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameEstella BAKER
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 5(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id609
      • created2006-09-29 00:00:00
      • modified2015-11-25 14:45:57
      • publication_date2009-11-02 00:00:00
      • first_nameJohn R.
      • last_nameSPENCER
      • occupationContact Point
      • institutionUniversity of Cambridge
      • addressSelwyn College s/n
      • postal_codeCB3 9DQ
      • countryUK
      • telephone+44(0) 1223 335846
      • fax+44(0) 1223 335837
      • emailjrs1000@cam.ac.uk
      • titleImplementing the European Arrest Warrant: A Tale of How Not to Do it
      • authorJohn R. SPENCER
      • co_author
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisherStatute Law Review, Vol. 30, Issue 3
      • pages184-202
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">The broad aim of the Extradition Act 2003 was to simplify extradition. It is a controversial piece of legislation. For its supporters, it is a welcome law ensuring that those who commit crimes in this country no longer evade justice by removing themselves abroad. For its detractors, it is a legislative sell-out which means that honest Englishmen, when falsely accused elsewhere of crimes they did not commit, are now removed, without a proper examination of the merits of the case, for trial in foreign legal systems which, by definition, leave much to be desired. The purpose of this paper, however, is not to examine the policy behind the Act. Instead it looks at the narrower question of the technical quality of the drafting by which the policy was—or was meant to be—carried out. Among other things, the Act was intended to implement within the United Kingdom the European Arrest Warrant, brought into being at the European level by a Framework Decision in June 2002.1 And the particular issue to be examined here is how competently, or otherwise, the relevant provisions of the Extradition Act carried this project into effect.</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywordsEAW,UK,implementation
      • slugimplementing-the-european-arrest-warrant-a-tale-of-how-not-to-do-it-1
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id731
      • full_nameJohn R. SPENCER
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 6(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1738
      • created2016-04-24 00:26:56
      • modified2016-04-24 00:35:08
      • publication_date2009-10-15 00:00:00
      • first_nameRobert
      • last_nameROTH
      • occupationMember
      • institutionUniversity of Geneva
      • addressRue de Lausanne 120B
      • postal_codeCP 67 - 1211 Gen
      • countrySwitzerland
      • telephone0041 22 37 98552
      • fax
      • emailrobert.roth@unige.ch
      • title The extradition of génocidaires
      • authorRobert ROTH in Paola GAETA (Ed.), "The UN Genocide Convention : A commentary"
      • co_author
      • publication_typebook_chapter
      • journal_publisherOxford University Press
      • pages278-309
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">This book is a much-needed Commentary on the Genocide Convention. It analyses and interprets the Convention thematically, thoroughly covering every article, drawing on the Convention's travaux préparatoires and subsequent developments in international law. The most complex and important provisions of the Convention, including the definitions of genocide and genocidal acts, have more than one contribution dedicated to them, allowing the Commentary to explore all aspects of these concepts. The Commentary also goes beyond the explicit provisions of the Convention to discuss topics such as the retroactive application of the Convention, its status in customary international law and its future.<br />  </p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords
      • slugthe-extradition-of-genocidaires
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameRobert ROTH
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
• query(array)
  • page59
• meta(array)
  • titlePublications
• $request->data(empty)
• $this->validationErrors(array)
  • Menu(empty)
  • MenuLink(empty)
  • MenuLinkTranslation(empty)
  • AcademicProject(empty)
  • SearchDocument(empty)
  • Page(empty)
  • PageTranslation(empty)
  • EuLegislatoryDocument(empty)
  • PhdDocument(empty)
  • Newsletter(empty)
  • NewsletterTranslation(empty)
  • EuCaseLawDocument(empty)
  • Member(empty)
  • Event(empty)
  • EventTranslation(empty)
  • Publication(empty)
  • Link(empty)
  • LinkTranslation(empty)
  • Attachment(empty)
  • AttachmentTranslation(empty)
• Loaded Helpers(array)
  • 0Asset
  • 1Attachment
  • 2Html
  • 3Share
  • 4Form
  • 5Paginator
  • 6CookiesWarning
  • 7EventDates
  • 8Website
  • 9FormCrypt
  • 10Number
  • 11SimpleGraph
  • 12Menus
  • 13DebugTimer
  • 14Toolbar
  • 15Text
  • 16HtmlToolbar

App Constants

CakePHP Constants

PHP Environment

Included Files

Include Paths

• 1/usr/share/php
• 2-> /var/web/vd13792/ulb008_releases/20220919065337/cakephp/lib/Cake/

Included Files

• core(array)
  • Behavior(array)
    • 0CORE/Model/Behavior/ContainableBehavior.php
  • Cache(array)
    • 0CORE/Cache/Cache.php
    • 1CORE/Cache/Engine/FileEngine.php
    • 2CORE/Cache/CacheEngine.php
  • Component(array)
    • 0CORE/Controller/Component/PaginatorComponent.php
    • 1CORE/Controller/Component/SessionComponent.php
  • Config(array)
    • 0CORE/Config/config.php
  • Configure(array)
    • 0CORE/Configure/PhpReader.php
    • 1CORE/Configure/ConfigReaderInterface.php
  • Controller(array)
    • 0CORE/Controller/Controller.php
    • 1CORE/Controller/ComponentCollection.php
    • 2CORE/Controller/Component.php
  • Datasource(array)
    • 0CORE/Model/Datasource/CakeSession.php
    • 1CORE/Model/Datasource/Database/Mysql.php
    • 2CORE/Model/Datasource/DboSource.php
    • 3CORE/Model/Datasource/DataSource.php
  • Error(array)
    • 0CORE/Error/exceptions.php
    • 1CORE/Error/ErrorHandler.php
  • I18n(array)
    • 0CORE/I18n/I18n.php
    • 1CORE/I18n/L10n.php
  • Log(array)
    • 0CORE/Log/CakeLog.php
    • 1CORE/Log/LogEngineCollection.php
    • 2CORE/Log/Engine/FileLog.php
    • 3CORE/Log/Engine/BaseLog.php
    • 4CORE/Log/CakeLogInterface.php
  • Model(array)
    • 0CORE/Model/Model.php
    • 1CORE/Model/BehaviorCollection.php
    • 2CORE/Model/ConnectionManager.php
    • 3CORE/Model/ModelBehavior.php
  • Network(array)
    • 0CORE/Network/CakeRequest.php
    • 1CORE/Network/CakeResponse.php
  • Other(array)
    • 0CORE/bootstrap.php
    • 1CORE/basics.php
    • 2CORE/Core/App.php
    • 3CORE/Core/Configure.php
    • 4CORE/Core/CakePlugin.php
    • 5CORE/Event/CakeEventManager.php
    • 6CORE/Event/CakeEventListener.php
    • 7CORE/Event/CakeEvent.php
    • 8CORE/Core/CakeObject.php
  • Routing(array)
    • 0CORE/Routing/Dispatcher.php
    • 1CORE/Routing/Filter/AssetDispatcher.php
    • 2CORE/Routing/DispatcherFilter.php
    • 3CORE/Routing/Filter/CacheDispatcher.php
    • 4CORE/Routing/Router.php
    • 5CORE/Routing/Route/CakeRoute.php
  • Utility(array)
    • 0CORE/Utility/Hash.php
    • 1CORE/Utility/Debugger.php
    • 2CORE/Utility/CakeText.php
    • 3CORE/Utility/Inflector.php
    • 4CORE/Utility/ObjectCollection.php
    • 5CORE/Utility/ClassRegistry.php
  • View(array)
    • 0CORE/View/HelperCollection.php
• app(array)
  • Behavior(array)
    • 0APP/Model/Behavior/CachableBehavior.php
  • Config(array)
    • 0APP/Config/core.php
    • 1APP/Config/preview/bootstrap.php
    • 2APP/Config/bootstrap.php
    • 3APP/Config/languages.php
    • 4APP/Config/routes.php
    • 5APP/Config/database.php
    • 6APP/Config/preview/database.php
  • Controller(array)
    • 0APP/Controller/PublicationsController.php
    • 1APP/Controller/AppController.php
  • Model(array)
    • 0APP/Model/Menu.php
    • 1APP/Model/MenuLink.php
    • 2APP/Model/MenuLinkTranslation.php
    • 3APP/Model/AcademicProject.php
    • 4APP/Model/AppModel.php
    • 5APP/Model/Page.php
    • 6APP/Model/PageTranslation.php
    • 7APP/Model/EuLegislatoryDocument.php
    • 8APP/Model/PhdDocument.php
    • 9APP/Model/Newsletter.php
    • 10APP/Model/NewsletterTranslation.php
    • 11APP/Model/EuCaseLawDocument.php
    • 12APP/Model/Member.php
    • 13APP/Model/Event.php
    • 14APP/Model/EventTranslation.php
    • 15APP/Model/Publication.php
    • 16APP/Model/Link.php
    • 17APP/Model/LinkTranslation.php
    • 18APP/Model/Attachment.php
    • 19APP/Model/AttachmentTranslation.php
  • Other(array)
    • 0APP/mysqli-overwrites.php
    • 1APP/Entity/AppEntity.php
    • 2APP/Entity/EventEntity.php
• plugins(array)
  • BoostCake(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0BoostCake/Config/bootstrap.php
    • Component(array)
      • 0BoostCake/Controller/Component/BoostCakeComponent.php
  • CakeAdmin(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0CakeAdmin/Config/routes.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0CakeAdmin/Lib/Routing/Route/AdminRoute.php
      • 1CakeAdmin/Lib/AdminConfig.php
      • 2CakeAdmin/Lib/Routing/Route/AdminBelongsToRoute.php
  • Contact(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Contact/Config/routes.php
  • DebugKit(array)
    • Component(array)
      • 0DebugKit/Controller/Component/ToolbarComponent.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0DebugKit/Lib/DebugMemory.php
      • 1DebugKit/Lib/Panel/HistoryPanel.php
      • 2DebugKit/Lib/DebugPanel.php
      • 3DebugKit/Lib/Panel/SessionPanel.php
      • 4DebugKit/Lib/Panel/RequestPanel.php
      • 5DebugKit/Lib/Panel/SqlLogPanel.php
      • 6DebugKit/Lib/Panel/TimerPanel.php
      • 7DebugKit/Lib/Panel/LogPanel.php
      • 8DebugKit/Lib/Log/Engine/DebugKitLog.php
      • 9DebugKit/Lib/Panel/VariablesPanel.php
      • 10DebugKit/Lib/Panel/EnvironmentPanel.php
      • 11DebugKit/Lib/Panel/IncludePanel.php
      • 12DebugKit/Lib/DebugTimer.php
      • 13DebugKit/Lib/DebugKitDebugger.php
  • Event(array)
    • Model(array)
      • 0Event/Model/PluginEvent.php
      • 1Event/Model/EventAppModel.php
      • 2Event/Model/PluginEventTranslation.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Event/Entity/PluginEventEntity.php
  • MailingService(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0MailingService/Config/routes.php
  • Media(array)
    • Component(array)
      • 0Media/Controller/Component/UploadComponent.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0Media/Model/PluginAttachment.php
      • 1Media/Model/PluginAttachmentTranslation.php
      • 2Media/Model/MediaAppModel.php
  • Menu(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Menu/Config/bootstrap.php
    • Component(array)
      • 0Menu/Controller/Component/MenusComponent.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0Menu/Model/PluginMenu.php
      • 1Menu/Model/MenuAppModel.php
      • 2Menu/Model/PluginMenuLink.php
      • 3Menu/Model/PluginMenuLinkTranslation.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Menu/Lib/Tree.php
      • 1Menu/Lib/Vertex.php
  • Page(array)
    • Model(array)
      • 0Page/Model/PluginPage.php
      • 1Page/Model/PluginPageTranslation.php
  • Search(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Search/Config/routes.php
    • Behavior(array)
      • 0Search/Model/Behavior/SearchableBehavior.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0Search/Model/SearchDocument.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Search/Vendor/DoubleMetaPhone.php
  • Share(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Share/Config/routes.php
  • System(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0System/Config/bootstrap.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0System/Lib/I18n/Language.php
      • 1System/Lib/Routing/Resources.php
      • 2System/Lib/Routing/Route/I18nResourceRoute.php
      • 3System/Lib/Routing/Route/ResourceRoute.php
      • 4System/Entity/Entity.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0System/Model/EntityModel.php
    • Behavior(array)
      • 0System/Model/Behavior/TranslatableBehavior.php
      • 1System/Model/Behavior/ViewsBehavior.php
      • 2System/Model/Behavior/SluggableBehavior.php
  • Utils(array)
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Utils/Lib/Routing/Filter/MaintenanceFilter.php
    • Component(array)
      • 0Utils/Controller/Component/FormCryptComponent.php
    • Behavior(array)
      • 0Utils/Model/Behavior/ArchivableBehavior.php