Publications

Request History

No previous requests logged.

Session

• 0(null)

Request

Cake Params

• plugin(null)
• controllerpublications
• actionindex
• named(empty)
• pass(empty)
• localeen
• paging(array)
  • Publication(array)
    • page66
    • current7
    • count612
    • prevPage(true)
    • nextPage(true)
    • pageCount88
    • order(array)
      • Publication.publication_datedesc
    • limit7
    • options(array)
      • page66
    • paramTypequerystring
    • queryScope(null)

Post data

No post data.

Query string

• page66

Cookie

To view Cookies, add CookieComponent to Controller

Current Route

• name(null)
• _fields(empty)
• resourceActionindex
• modelPublication
• keys(array)
  • 0locale
• options(array)
  • pass(empty)
• defaults(array)
  • controllerpublications
  • actionindex
  • plugin(null)
• template/:locale/publications
• config(empty)

Sql Logs

Logs

View Variables

• menuNameCurrentMenuLinkmain
• title_for_layoutPublications
• publications(array)
  • 0(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1474
      • created2016-03-30 19:49:24
      • modified2016-04-24 00:01:47
      • publication_date2009-01-02 00:00:00
      • first_nameTommaso
      • last_nameRAFARACI
      • occupationMember
      • institutionUniversity of Catania
      • addressVia Gallo n. 24
      • postal_code95124, Catania
      • countryItaly
      • telephone0039 3358269984
      • fax
      • emailtrafaraci@lex.unict.it
      • titleThe principle of non bis in idem in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice
      • authorTommaso RAFARACI in Anne WEYEMBERGH and Stefan BRAUM (Eds.), "Le contrôle juridictionnel dans l’espace pénal européen/The judicial control in EU cooperation in criminal matters"
      • co_author
      • publication_typebook_chapter
      • journal_publisherÉditions de l’Université de Bruxelles
      • pages93-110
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">The judicial review of the European criminal law is of major importance given the sensitivity of the matter. In this regard, the skills that the Court of Justice of the European Communities was awarded with the Amsterdam Treaty prove fundamental. Despite the restrictions that continue to taint the currently under the third pillar of the Treaty on European Union, the Court of Justice made a series of crucial saves for the sector.</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords
      • slugthe-principle-of-non-bis-in-idem-in-the-jurisprudence-of-the-european-court-of-justice-1
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameTommaso RAFARACI
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 1(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1733
      • created2016-04-23 16:23:54
      • modified2016-04-23 16:23:58
      • publication_date2009-01-02 00:00:00
      • first_nameMartin
      • last_nameBOSE
      • occupationMember
      • institutionUniversity of Bonn
      • addressAdenauerallee 24-42
      • postal_code53113 Bonn
      • countryGermany
      • telephone0049228739155
      • fax0049228732518
      • emailboese@jura.uni-bonn.de
      • titleTrafficking in human beings in Germany
      • authorMartin BOSE in Anne WEYEMBERGH and Veronica SANTAMARIA (Eds.), "The evaluation of European criminal law: The example of the Framework Decision on combatting trafficking in human beings"
      • co_author
      • publication_typebook_chapter
      • journal_publisherÉditions de l’Université de Bruxelles
      • pages109-130
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">The role of evaluation has become increasingly important in the context of EU policies in the field of judicial cooperation in criminal matters. This evolution is the result of an increasing number of legally binding instruments adopted in the framework of the third pillar of the European Union and of their growing impact on national legal systems. Evaluation represents an essential tool to appreciate the legislative and practical implementation of existing European criminal law and to assess and measure in greater detail the effects and impact of EU legislation. Therefore, it plays a significant role in the establishment and strengthening of mutual trust in the EU area of freedom, security and justice.This book aims at developing a methodology for the assessment of the implementation and impact of European criminal law.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">The main purpose of this exercise is to test this methodology on the Framework Decision of 19 July 2002 on combating trafficking in human beings. The choice of this legal instrument is particularly appropriate since it is aimed at harmonising the Member States’ national laws as regards a most serious and specific offence which is related to modern slavery and exploitation of human beings.The book starts with a general analysis of evaluation. This is followed by a series of country chapters, analysing the transposition and implementation as well as the impact of the Framework Decision on trafficking in human beings in 12 selected Member States of the European Union. These contributions served as the basis for more general conclusions drawn up in the final part of the book.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">This book is the result of a team work performed by academics and researchers who are members of ECLAN (European Criminal Law Academic Network).</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords
      • slugtrafficking-in-human-beings-in-germany
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameMartin BOSE
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 2(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1737
      • created2016-04-24 00:19:58
      • modified2016-04-24 00:20:12
      • publication_date2009-01-02 00:00:00
      • first_nameRobert
      • last_nameROTH
      • occupationMember
      • institutionUniversity of Geneva
      • addressRue de Lausanne 120B
      • postal_codeCP 67 - 1211 Gen
      • countrySwitzerland
      • telephone0041 22 37 98552
      • fax
      • emailrobert.roth@unige.ch
      • titlePolitiques pénales et évaluation : des défis renouvelés
      • authorRobert ROTH in Anne WEYEMBERGH and Veronica SANTAMARIA (Eds.), "The evaluation of European criminal law: The example of the Framework Decision on combatting trafficking in human beings"
      • co_author
      • publication_typebook_chapter
      • journal_publisherÉditions de l’Université de Bruxelles
      • pages41-50
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">The role of evaluation has become increasingly important in the context of EU policies in the field of judicial cooperation in criminal matters. This evolution is the result of an increasing number of legally binding instruments adopted in the framework of the third pillar of the European Union and of their growing impact on national legal systems. Evaluation represents an essential tool to appreciate the legislative and practical implementation of existing European criminal law and to assess and measure in greater detail the effects and impact of EU legislation. Therefore, it plays a significant role in the establishment and strengthening of mutual trust in the EU area of freedom, security and justice.This book aims at developing a methodology for the assessment of the implementation and impact of European criminal law.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">The main purpose of this exercise is to test this methodology on the Framework Decision of 19 July 2002 on combating trafficking in human beings. The choice of this legal instrument is particularly appropriate since it is aimed at harmonising the Member States’ national laws as regards a most serious and specific offence which is related to modern slavery and exploitation of human beings.The book starts with a general analysis of evaluation. This is followed by a series of country chapters, analysing the transposition and implementation as well as the impact of the Framework Decision on trafficking in human beings in 12 selected Member States of the European Union. These contributions served as the basis for more general conclusions drawn up in the final part of the book.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">This book is the result of a team work performed by academics and researchers who are members of ECLAN (European Criminal Law Academic Network).</p>
      • languagesFrench
      • keywords
      • slugpolitiques-penales-et-evaluation-des-defis-renouveles
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameRobert ROTH
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 3(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1483
      • created2016-03-30 22:16:57
      • modified2016-04-24 10:38:28
      • publication_date2009-01-02 00:00:00
      • first_nameWouter
      • last_nameVAN BALLEGOOIJ
      • occupationMember
      • institutionEuropean Parliament
      • addressRue Wiertz 60
      • postal_codeB-1047, Brussels
      • countryBelgium
      • telephone0032 22843590
      • fax
      • emailwouter.vanballegooij@europarl.europa.eu
      • titleThe Netherlands and mutual recognition: Between proportionality and the rule of law
      • authorWouter VAN BALLEGOOIJ in Anne WEYEMBERGH, Gisèle VERNIMMEN and Laura SURANO (Eds.), "The future of mutual recognition in criminal matters in the European Union"
      • co_author
      • publication_typebook_chapter
      • journal_publisherÉditions de l’Université de Bruxelles
      • pages401-419
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">In the EU’s fast-growing Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, the principle of mutual recognition should play a key role in the field of judicial cooperation in criminal matters. Since mutual recognition was enshrined as a cornerstone of judicial cooperation in the EU by the European Council of Tampere in 1999, an increasing number of binding instruments based on this principle have been adopted in the framework of the EU’s Third Pillar. The considerable impact of those instruments on national criminal legal systems has often required a major effort by Member States in adjusting their national legislation so that it complies with the new mechanisms agreed at EU level. What are the real difficulties encountered by Member States in the transposition of these legislative texts into national law and, even earlier, when the texts are being negotiated within the Council of the EU? What lessons can be learned from the early years of their practical implementation by the competent judicial authorities? And, above all, what will be the future role and scope of the principle of mutual recognition in criminal matters in Europe? The entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty and the adoption of a new multi-annual programme (replacing the Hague Programme) to strengthen the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice are both pending.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">In this crucial time of transition and uncertainty, the book seeks to provide answers to the above questions and many other related issues. Through its country by country approach covering the vast majority of the Member States, it intends to provide policymakers, practitioners, academics and researchers with a comprehensive analysis of the problems that have emerged and the solutions envisaged by each State in their implementation of mutual recognition instruments. The country chapters are followed by a final EU-wide analysis that seeks to identify common themes and obstacles and to consider future options and possible scenarios.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">The whole study, based on in-depth research combined with interviews conducted with hundreds of practitioners and experts from across the EU, amounts to a remarkable team performance carried out together with academics and researcher members of ECLAN (European Criminal Law Academic Network).</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords
      • slugthe-netherlands-and-mutual-recognition-between-proportionality-and-the-rule-of-law
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameWouter VAN BALLEGOOIJ
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 4(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1743
      • created2016-04-24 10:34:16
      • modified2016-04-24 10:35:05
      • publication_date2009-01-02 00:00:00
      • first_nameFrançoise
      • last_nameTULKENS
      • occupationMember
      • institutionKing Baudouin Foundation
      • addressPlace Montesquieu 2
      • postal_code1348, Louvain-la
      • countryBelgium
      • telephone003210472111
      • fax
      • emailfrancoise.tulkens@uclouvain.be
      • titleThe European Convention on Human Rights and Church-State relations: pluralism vs. pluralism
      • authorFrançoise TULKENS
      • co_author
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisherCardozo Law Review, Volume 30, Issue 6
      • pages2575 - 2591
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;"> There  are  three  key  provisions  of  the  European  Convention  onHuman  Rights  (ECHR)  that  deal  with  religion.    Article  9  provides  the basic  framework  for  freedom  of  religion. Article  14  ensures  that ECHR-acknowledged     rights     should     be     free     from     religious discrimination. Article 2 of the first Protocol gives parents the right to regulate  the  religious  education  of  their  children.    The  first  and  mostcentral  is  Article  9.    As  in  many  international  treaties,  Article  9  of  the ECHR   guarantees   to   everyone   the   right   to   freedom   of   thought, conscience  and  religion. This  right  implies,  among  others,  freedom either  alone  or  in  community  with  others  and  in  public  or  private,  to manifest  one’s  religion  or  belief  in  worship,  teaching,  practice  andobservance;  but  this  external  expression  of  religion  may  be  subject edunder   Article   9,   Section   2   to   limitations   prescribed   by   law   andnecessary  in  a  democratic  society  in  the  interests  of  public  safety  andfor  the  protection  of  public  order,  health,  morals  and  the  rights  and  freedoms  of  others. As  we  see,  there  is  a  substantial  dividing  line between  freedom  of  religion  (internal  conviction,  inner  sphere)  and freedom  to  manifest  one’s  religion  in  the  public  sphere  (the  expressionof  that  conviction).    At  the  same  time,  freedom  of  religion  has  an individual as well as a collective aspect.</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords
      • slugthe-european-convention-on-human-rights-and-church-state-relations-pluralism-vs-pluralism
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameFrançoise TULKENS
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 5(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1257
      • created2015-10-21 23:57:36
      • modified2016-04-24 12:11:01
      • publication_date2009-01-02 00:00:00
      • first_nameAnne
      • last_nameWEYEMBERGH
      • occupationCoordinator
      • institutionULB-IEE
      • addressAv. F. Roosevelt 39
      • postal_code1050, Brussels
      • countryBelgium
      • telephone0032 2 650 3072
      • fax0032 2 650 30 68
      • emailaweyembe@ulb.ac.be
      • titleLe contrôle juridictionnel dans l’espace pénal européen/The judicial control in EU cooperation in criminal matters
      • authorAnne WEYEMBERGH
      • co_authorStefan BRAUM (Eds.)
      • publication_typebook
      • journal_publisherÉditions de l’Université de Bruxelles
      • pages352
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">The judicial review of the European criminal law is of major importance given the sensitivity of the matter. In this regard, the skills that the Court of Justice of the European Communities was awarded with the Amsterdam Treaty prove fundamental. Despite the restrictions that continue to taint the currently under the third pillar of the Treaty on European Union, the Court of Justice made a series of crucial saves for the sector.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">Le contrôle juridictionnel exercé sur l’espace pénal européen revêt une importance majeure vu la sensibilité de la matière. A cet égard, les compétences que la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes s’est vu attribuer avec le traité d’Amsterdam se révèlent fondamentales. Malgré les restrictions qui continuent de les entacher à l’heure actuelle dans le cadre du troisième pilier du traité sur l’Union européenne, la Cour de justice a rendu une série d’arrêts essentiels pour le secteur.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;"></p> <p style="text-align: justify;">L’ouvrage analyse de manière approfondie la teneur du contrôle juridictionnel exercé en matière pénale par la CJ et la jurisprudence de celle-ci. Il débute avec deux contributions introductives et comporte ensuite quatre parties distinctes. La première consiste à examiner les réponses données par la Cour de justice aux conflits de base légale entre les premier et troisième piliers. La deuxième est principalement consacrée au dialogue établi entre la Cour de justice et les juridictions nationales : elle rassemble des articles relatifs à l’arrêt du 16 juin 2005 dans l’affaire Pupino et aux décisions préjudicielles portant sur le mandat d’arrêt européen ou sur le principe non bis in idem. La troisième concerne le contrôle juridictionnel et la protection des droits fondamentaux : les contributions abordent notamment la question des listes antiterroristes ou celle de la protection des données. Quant à la dernière partie, elle a trait aux réformes et perspectives du contrôle juridictionnel dans l’espace pénal européen : il y est surtout question de la mise en place de la procédure préjudicielle d’urgence et des améliorations qu’introduirait le traité de Lisbonne s’il entrait en vigueur. </p> <p style="text-align: justify;"></p> <p style="text-align: justify;">L’ouvrage est le fruit de la collaboration d’une équipe internationale composée d’académiques et de chercheurs, pour la plupart membres du réseau académique de droit pénal européen (ECLAN), de juges à la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes ou à la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme, d’autres praticiens ayant une expérience judiciaire ou de fonctionnaires européens.</p>
      • languagesEnglish, French
      • keywords
      • slugle-controle-juridictionnel-dans-l-espace-penal-europeen-the-judicial-control-in-eu-cooperation-in-criminal-matters
      • attachment_id1569
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameAnne WEYEMBERGH
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id1569
      • nameTable_of_contents_Contro_le_jurisdiccitionnel.pdf
      • extensionpdf
      • filenameTable of contents - Contrôle jurisdiccitionnel
      • mimetypeapplication/pdf
      • md5033030573acc18428588c7a831c699b0
      • typedocument
      • size292285
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(false)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created2015-10-21 23:57:28
      • modified2015-10-21 23:57:28
      • title
      • online(true)
  • 6(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1514
      • created2016-04-02 11:40:42
      • modified2016-04-08 12:57:38
      • publication_date2009-01-02 00:00:00
      • first_nameEstella
      • last_nameBAKER
      • occupationMember
      • institutionDe Montfort University
      • addressThe Gateway, Leicester
      • postal_codeLE1 9BH
      • countryUnited Kingdom
      • telephone0044 116 257 7256
      • fax
      • emailebaker@dmu.ac.uk
      • titleFrom past imperfect to future perfect? A longitudinal study of the third pillar
      • authorEstella BAKER
      • co_authorChristopher HARDING
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisherEuropean Law Review, Volume 34, Issue 1
      • pages25-54
      • abstract<div class="simple-item-view-description" style="margin: 20px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: sans-serif; line-height: 20.93px; text-align: justify; background: transparent;"> <div style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; background: transparent;" xmlns:i18n="http://apache.org/cocoon/i18n/2.1">This discussion pursues a “longitudinal” analysis of the development of European level efforts at crime control, looking at some of the past to inform an understanding of both the present Third Pillar centre of such policy and measures, and the prospects for future action in the wake of the Lisbon Treaty. It challenges the idea that this is a relatively new (post-Maastricht) area of European activity by emphasising a wellestablished history and dynamic of intergovernmental co-operation, and argues that this momentum will not decrease in the near future. The discussion also probes what may be seen as problematic within the method of the Third Pillar, and then what may prove to be the legacy of the Third Pillar, even in the event of its possible collapse should what is envisaged in the Lisbon Treaty actually take place.</div> <div></div> </div>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords
      • slugfrom-past-imperfect-to-future-perfect-a-longitudinal-study-of-the-third-pillar
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameEstella BAKER
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
• query(array)
  • page66
• meta(array)
  • titlePublications
• $request->data(empty)
• $this->validationErrors(array)
  • Menu(empty)
  • MenuLink(empty)
  • MenuLinkTranslation(empty)
  • AcademicProject(empty)
  • SearchDocument(empty)
  • Page(empty)
  • PageTranslation(empty)
  • EuLegislatoryDocument(empty)
  • PhdDocument(empty)
  • Newsletter(empty)
  • NewsletterTranslation(empty)
  • EuCaseLawDocument(empty)
  • Member(empty)
  • Event(empty)
  • EventTranslation(empty)
  • Publication(empty)
  • Link(empty)
  • LinkTranslation(empty)
  • Attachment(empty)
  • AttachmentTranslation(empty)
• Loaded Helpers(array)
  • 0Asset
  • 1Attachment
  • 2Html
  • 3Share
  • 4Form
  • 5Paginator
  • 6CookiesWarning
  • 7EventDates
  • 8Website
  • 9FormCrypt
  • 10Number
  • 11SimpleGraph
  • 12Menus
  • 13DebugTimer
  • 14Toolbar
  • 15Text
  • 16HtmlToolbar

App Constants

CakePHP Constants

PHP Environment

Included Files

Include Paths

• 1/usr/share/php
• 2-> /var/web/vd13792/ulb008_releases/20220919065337/cakephp/lib/Cake/

Included Files

• core(array)
  • Behavior(array)
    • 0CORE/Model/Behavior/ContainableBehavior.php
  • Cache(array)
    • 0CORE/Cache/Cache.php
    • 1CORE/Cache/Engine/FileEngine.php
    • 2CORE/Cache/CacheEngine.php
  • Component(array)
    • 0CORE/Controller/Component/PaginatorComponent.php
    • 1CORE/Controller/Component/SessionComponent.php
  • Config(array)
    • 0CORE/Config/config.php
  • Configure(array)
    • 0CORE/Configure/PhpReader.php
    • 1CORE/Configure/ConfigReaderInterface.php
  • Controller(array)
    • 0CORE/Controller/Controller.php
    • 1CORE/Controller/ComponentCollection.php
    • 2CORE/Controller/Component.php
  • Datasource(array)
    • 0CORE/Model/Datasource/CakeSession.php
    • 1CORE/Model/Datasource/Database/Mysql.php
    • 2CORE/Model/Datasource/DboSource.php
    • 3CORE/Model/Datasource/DataSource.php
  • Error(array)
    • 0CORE/Error/exceptions.php
    • 1CORE/Error/ErrorHandler.php
  • I18n(array)
    • 0CORE/I18n/I18n.php
    • 1CORE/I18n/L10n.php
  • Log(array)
    • 0CORE/Log/CakeLog.php
    • 1CORE/Log/LogEngineCollection.php
    • 2CORE/Log/Engine/FileLog.php
    • 3CORE/Log/Engine/BaseLog.php
    • 4CORE/Log/CakeLogInterface.php
  • Model(array)
    • 0CORE/Model/Model.php
    • 1CORE/Model/BehaviorCollection.php
    • 2CORE/Model/ConnectionManager.php
    • 3CORE/Model/ModelBehavior.php
  • Network(array)
    • 0CORE/Network/CakeRequest.php
    • 1CORE/Network/CakeResponse.php
  • Other(array)
    • 0CORE/bootstrap.php
    • 1CORE/basics.php
    • 2CORE/Core/App.php
    • 3CORE/Core/Configure.php
    • 4CORE/Core/CakePlugin.php
    • 5CORE/Event/CakeEventManager.php
    • 6CORE/Event/CakeEventListener.php
    • 7CORE/Event/CakeEvent.php
    • 8CORE/Core/CakeObject.php
  • Routing(array)
    • 0CORE/Routing/Dispatcher.php
    • 1CORE/Routing/Filter/AssetDispatcher.php
    • 2CORE/Routing/DispatcherFilter.php
    • 3CORE/Routing/Filter/CacheDispatcher.php
    • 4CORE/Routing/Router.php
    • 5CORE/Routing/Route/CakeRoute.php
  • Utility(array)
    • 0CORE/Utility/Hash.php
    • 1CORE/Utility/Debugger.php
    • 2CORE/Utility/CakeText.php
    • 3CORE/Utility/Inflector.php
    • 4CORE/Utility/ObjectCollection.php
    • 5CORE/Utility/ClassRegistry.php
  • View(array)
    • 0CORE/View/HelperCollection.php
• app(array)
  • Behavior(array)
    • 0APP/Model/Behavior/CachableBehavior.php
  • Config(array)
    • 0APP/Config/core.php
    • 1APP/Config/preview/bootstrap.php
    • 2APP/Config/bootstrap.php
    • 3APP/Config/languages.php
    • 4APP/Config/routes.php
    • 5APP/Config/database.php
    • 6APP/Config/preview/database.php
  • Controller(array)
    • 0APP/Controller/PublicationsController.php
    • 1APP/Controller/AppController.php
  • Model(array)
    • 0APP/Model/Menu.php
    • 1APP/Model/MenuLink.php
    • 2APP/Model/MenuLinkTranslation.php
    • 3APP/Model/AcademicProject.php
    • 4APP/Model/AppModel.php
    • 5APP/Model/Page.php
    • 6APP/Model/PageTranslation.php
    • 7APP/Model/EuLegislatoryDocument.php
    • 8APP/Model/PhdDocument.php
    • 9APP/Model/Newsletter.php
    • 10APP/Model/NewsletterTranslation.php
    • 11APP/Model/EuCaseLawDocument.php
    • 12APP/Model/Member.php
    • 13APP/Model/Event.php
    • 14APP/Model/EventTranslation.php
    • 15APP/Model/Publication.php
    • 16APP/Model/Link.php
    • 17APP/Model/LinkTranslation.php
    • 18APP/Model/Attachment.php
    • 19APP/Model/AttachmentTranslation.php
  • Other(array)
    • 0APP/mysqli-overwrites.php
    • 1APP/Entity/AppEntity.php
    • 2APP/Entity/EventEntity.php
• plugins(array)
  • BoostCake(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0BoostCake/Config/bootstrap.php
    • Component(array)
      • 0BoostCake/Controller/Component/BoostCakeComponent.php
  • CakeAdmin(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0CakeAdmin/Config/routes.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0CakeAdmin/Lib/Routing/Route/AdminRoute.php
      • 1CakeAdmin/Lib/AdminConfig.php
      • 2CakeAdmin/Lib/Routing/Route/AdminBelongsToRoute.php
  • Contact(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Contact/Config/routes.php
  • DebugKit(array)
    • Component(array)
      • 0DebugKit/Controller/Component/ToolbarComponent.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0DebugKit/Lib/DebugMemory.php
      • 1DebugKit/Lib/Panel/HistoryPanel.php
      • 2DebugKit/Lib/DebugPanel.php
      • 3DebugKit/Lib/Panel/SessionPanel.php
      • 4DebugKit/Lib/Panel/RequestPanel.php
      • 5DebugKit/Lib/Panel/SqlLogPanel.php
      • 6DebugKit/Lib/Panel/TimerPanel.php
      • 7DebugKit/Lib/Panel/LogPanel.php
      • 8DebugKit/Lib/Log/Engine/DebugKitLog.php
      • 9DebugKit/Lib/Panel/VariablesPanel.php
      • 10DebugKit/Lib/Panel/EnvironmentPanel.php
      • 11DebugKit/Lib/Panel/IncludePanel.php
      • 12DebugKit/Lib/DebugTimer.php
      • 13DebugKit/Lib/DebugKitDebugger.php
  • Event(array)
    • Model(array)
      • 0Event/Model/PluginEvent.php
      • 1Event/Model/EventAppModel.php
      • 2Event/Model/PluginEventTranslation.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Event/Entity/PluginEventEntity.php
  • MailingService(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0MailingService/Config/routes.php
  • Media(array)
    • Component(array)
      • 0Media/Controller/Component/UploadComponent.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0Media/Model/PluginAttachment.php
      • 1Media/Model/PluginAttachmentTranslation.php
      • 2Media/Model/MediaAppModel.php
  • Menu(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Menu/Config/bootstrap.php
    • Component(array)
      • 0Menu/Controller/Component/MenusComponent.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0Menu/Model/PluginMenu.php
      • 1Menu/Model/MenuAppModel.php
      • 2Menu/Model/PluginMenuLink.php
      • 3Menu/Model/PluginMenuLinkTranslation.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Menu/Lib/Tree.php
      • 1Menu/Lib/Vertex.php
  • Page(array)
    • Model(array)
      • 0Page/Model/PluginPage.php
      • 1Page/Model/PluginPageTranslation.php
  • Search(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Search/Config/routes.php
    • Behavior(array)
      • 0Search/Model/Behavior/SearchableBehavior.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0Search/Model/SearchDocument.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Search/Vendor/DoubleMetaPhone.php
  • Share(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Share/Config/routes.php
  • System(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0System/Config/bootstrap.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0System/Lib/I18n/Language.php
      • 1System/Lib/Routing/Resources.php
      • 2System/Lib/Routing/Route/I18nResourceRoute.php
      • 3System/Lib/Routing/Route/ResourceRoute.php
      • 4System/Entity/Entity.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0System/Model/EntityModel.php
    • Behavior(array)
      • 0System/Model/Behavior/TranslatableBehavior.php
      • 1System/Model/Behavior/ViewsBehavior.php
      • 2System/Model/Behavior/SluggableBehavior.php
  • Utils(array)
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Utils/Lib/Routing/Filter/MaintenanceFilter.php
    • Component(array)
      • 0Utils/Controller/Component/FormCryptComponent.php
    • Behavior(array)
      • 0Utils/Model/Behavior/ArchivableBehavior.php