Publications

Request History

No previous requests logged.

Session

• 0(null)

Request

Cake Params

• plugin(null)
• controllerpublications
• actionindex
• named(empty)
• pass(empty)
• localeen
• paging(array)
  • Publication(array)
    • page26
    • current7
    • count612
    • prevPage(true)
    • nextPage(true)
    • pageCount88
    • order(array)
      • Publication.publication_datedesc
    • limit7
    • options(array)
      • page26
    • paramTypequerystring
    • queryScope(null)

Post data

No post data.

Query string

• page26

Cookie

To view Cookies, add CookieComponent to Controller

Current Route

• name(null)
• _fields(empty)
• resourceActionindex
• modelPublication
• keys(array)
  • 0locale
• options(array)
  • pass(empty)
• defaults(array)
  • controllerpublications
  • actionindex
  • plugin(null)
• template/:locale/publications
• config(empty)

Sql Logs

Logs

View Variables

• menuNameCurrentMenuLinkmain
• title_for_layoutPublications
• publications(array)
  • 0(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1504
      • created2016-04-02 10:55:09
      • modified2016-04-24 22:46:23
      • publication_date2014-01-02 00:00:00
      • first_nameLorena
      • last_nameBACHMAIER-WINTER
      • occupationMember
      • institutionComplutense University of Madrid
      • addressCdad. Universitaria
      • postal_code28040 Madrid
      • countrySpain
      • telephone0034 913945798
      • fax
      • emaill.bachmaier@der.ucm.es
      • titleSection III – Criminal procedure. Information society and penal law. General report
      • authorLorena BACHMAIER-WINTER
      • co_author
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisherRevue internationale de droit pénal, Volume 85, Issue 1
      • pages75-127
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">The present general report has been prepared for the XIXth International Congress on Criminal Law that will be held in Rio de Janeiro on 31st August to 6th September 2014 within the AIDP (Association Internationale de Droit Pénal / International Association of Penal Law). The topic of this world congress is focused on the use and impact of ICT in the criminal law and the criminal justice systems, with the aim of understanding and facing the challenges the information society represents for the criminal justice systems.<br />  </p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords
      • slugsection-iii-criminal-procedure-information-society-and-penal-law-general-report
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameLorena BACHMAIER-WINTER
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 1(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1509
      • created2016-04-02 11:11:17
      • modified2016-04-24 22:47:03
      • publication_date2014-01-02 00:00:00
      • first_nameLorena
      • last_nameBACHMAIER-WINTER
      • occupationMember
      • institution Complutense University of Madrid
      • addressCdad. Universitaria
      • postal_code75120
      • countrySpain
      • telephone0034 913945798
      • fax
      • emaill.bachmaier@der.ucm.es
      • titleThe Proposal for a Directive on the European Investigation Order and the grounds for refusal. A critical assessment
      • authorLorena BACHMAIER-WINTER in Stefano RUGGERI (Ed.), "Transnational evidence and multicultural inquiries in Europe"
      • co_author
      • publication_typebook_chapter
      • journal_publisherSpringer
      • pages71-90
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">This book deals with the gathering of evidence in cross-border investigations in Europe. The issue of obtaining evidence in and from European countries has been among the most debated issues of EU cross-border cooperation in criminal matters over the last two decades, going through periods of intensive discussions and showing an extraordinary adaptability to the evolution of EU legislation for criminal matters. On the other hand, the prosecution and investigations of cross-border cases pose unprecedented challenges in the European scenario, characterized by the increasing flow and activity of citizens over the territory of more than one country and therefore by the need to lay the foundations of a transcultural criminal justice system.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">The book analyses this complex topic starting with the current perspectives of EU legislation, thus providing a critical analysis of the legislative initiative aimed at introducing a new tool for gathering almost any type of evidence in other Member States, i.e., the European Investigation Order. On a second level, this study deals with the solution models and human rights challenges posed by the increasingly intensive dialogues between domestic and supranational case laws, and formulates essential guidelines for setting up a fair transnational enquiry system in Europe.</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords
      • slugthe-proposal-for-a-directive-on-the-european-investigation-order-and-the-grounds-for-refusal-a-critical-assessment
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameLorena BACHMAIER-WINTER
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 2(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1258
      • created2015-10-22 00:07:23
      • modified2016-04-24 12:33:11
      • publication_date2014-01-02 00:00:00
      • first_nameAnne
      • last_nameWEYEMBERGH
      • occupationCoordinator
      • institutionULB-IEE
      • addressAv. F. Roosevelt 39
      • postal_code1050, Brussels
      • countryBelgium
      • telephone0032 2 650 3072
      • fax0032 2 650 30 68
      • emailaweyembe@ulb.ac.be
      • titleCritical assessment of the existing European arrest warrant Framework Decision
      • authorAnne WEYEMBERGH, Ines ARMADA
      • co_authorChloe BRIERE
      • publication_typestudy
      • journal_publisherEuropean Parliament
      • pages68
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">After ten years of practical implementation of the European Arrest Warrant Framework Decision, this research paper aims to analyse itsstrengths and weaknesses, and reflect on its future. Twelve main issues are reflected upon. Following a description of each of these issues, including concrete examples, the main arguments for and against action at EU level are presented. Specific solutions are eventually suggested.</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords
      • slugcritical-assessment-of-the-existing-european-arrest-warrant-framework-decision
      • attachment_id1573
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameAnne WEYEMBERGH
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id1573
      • nameIPOL_JOIN_ET_282013_29510979_28ANN01_29_EN.pdf
      • extensionpdf
      • filenameIPOL-JOIN_ET%282013%29510979%28ANN01%29_EN
      • mimetypeapplication/pdf
      • md52d6ea2e8932fc361ebfdd0dcba96c2b0
      • typedocument
      • size737395
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(false)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created2015-10-22 00:10:39
      • modified2015-10-22 00:10:39
      • title
      • online(true)
  • 3(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1280
      • created2015-10-23 12:57:04
      • modified2015-11-17 11:45:47
      • publication_date2014-01-01 00:00:00
      • first_nameAnnika
      • last_nameSUOMINEN
      • occupationContact Point
      • institutionUniversity of Bergen
      • addressMagnus Lagabøtes plass 1, POB 7806
      • postal_code5020
      • countryNO
      • telephone
      • fax
      • emailannika.suominen@jur.uib.no
      • titleWhat role for legal certainty in criminal law within the area of freedom, security and justice in the EU?
      • authorAnnika SUOMINEN
      • co_author
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisherBergen Journal of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 1/2014
      • pages1-31
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">The article analyses the current position of legal certainty within the area of freedom, security and justice, and more specifically in EU criminal law. The current legal status of EU criminal law is first briefly presented. Thereafter the area and its present status are described, as is the concept of legal certainty within the area. The characteristics of EU criminal law are focused on, especially in relation to the nature of a European criminal justice ‘system’, which demonstrates why the EU is different as compared to the Member States. This difference especially affects legal certainty and the new legislative initiatives. To exemplify legal certainty, four examples from EU criminal law are chosen. These are a) mutual recognition in relation to human rights, b) minimum procedural rights, c) the position of the victim, which quite recently has been added to the EU criminal law field and d) the possible European public prosecutor’s office, where focus is laid on judicial review from a legal certainty point of view. These four examples are chosen due to their exemplification of how the EU within the area of freedom, security and justice perceives legal certainty and what is currently considered important for this. In the final chapter, some concluding remarks are made to sum up the situation.</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords(null)
      • slugwhat-role-for-legal-certainty-in-criminal-law-within-the-area-of-freedom-security-and-justice-in-the-eu
      • attachment_id1589
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameAnnika SUOMINEN
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id1589
      • name151_1_PB.pdf
      • extensionpdf
      • filename151-1-PB
      • mimetypeapplication/pdf
      • md55b346f1cd5bc3407a07cc799225a80d0
      • typedocument
      • size742170
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(false)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created2015-10-23 12:56:12
      • modified2015-10-23 12:56:12
      • title
      • online(true)
  • 4(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1350
      • created2016-02-29 16:16:58
      • modified2016-04-23 12:29:13
      • publication_date2014-01-01 00:00:00
      • first_nameMartin
      • last_nameBOSE
      • occupationMember
      • institutionUniversity of Bonn
      • addressAdenauerallee 24-42
      • postal_code53113 Bonn
      • countryGermany
      • telephone0049228739155
      • fax0049228732518
      • emailboese@jura.uni-bonn.de
      • titleHuman rights and legal limits on the use of deception detection methods: A view from Germany
      • authorMartin BOSE
      • co_author
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisherEuropean Psychologist, Volume 19, Issue 3
      • pages221-223
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">Establishing the truth is a key element of legal proceedings, criminal investigations in particular. It is an essential precondition for prosecuting and sentencing the guilty, but also for protecting the innocent. With regard to the latter, the obligation to reveal the truth is an emanation of procedural justice and a procedural safeguard for the accused. The revelation of the truth is not, however, an objective to be pursued ‘‘at any price.’’ Law enforcement authorities and courts have to respect the fundamental rights and the legal status of the defendant in criminal proceedings. Thus, from a legal perspective, methods and techniques of deception detection are ambivalent; a useful instrument for law enforcement on the one hand, a potential threat to individual rights on the other. The articles in this special issue provide a rich panoply of the potentials and challenges of deception detection in criminal investigations. In this article, the author deals mainly with the limitations arising from the legal and procedural framework.</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords
      • slughuman-rights-and-legal-limits-on-the-use-of-deception-detection-methods-a-view-from-germany
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameMartin BOSE
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 5(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1092
      • created2012-08-02 00:00:00
      • modified2015-12-16 13:43:35
      • publication_date2013-12-09 00:00:00
      • first_nameSabine
      • last_nameGLESS
      • occupationManagement Committee and Contact Point
      • institutionUniversity of Basel
      • addressPeter Merian-Weg 8 Postfach
      • postal_code4002
      • countrySwitzerland
      • telephone+41 (0)61 267 28 73
      • fax+41 (0)61 267 25 48
      • emailsabine.gless@unibas.ch
      • titleThe comparative method in European Courts: A comparison between the CJEU and ECtHR
      • authorSabine GLESS
      • co_authorJeannine MARTIN
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisherBergen Journal of Criminal Law & Criminal Justice , Vol. 1, Issue 1
      • pages36-52
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">If European Courts were ‘playing house’ in the traditional, stereotypical way, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) would take the role of the rather soft-spoken, but on certain points firm, ‘Mommy’. Meanwhile, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) would play the bold, sometimes gruff, and occasionally audaciously acting ‘Daddy’ – with both taking care of the well-being of their children, i.e. the Member States, including human rights issues.<br /> At play, both courts use a comparative method to justify their decisions.<br /> How do they proceed? And why is there – as claimed at the very beginning – a difference in the application of the choice of ‘comparative method’?</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywordsHuman rights,comparative law
      • slugthe-comparative-method-in-european-courts-a-comparison-between-the-cjeu-and-ecthr
      • attachment_id1849
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id1251
      • full_nameSabine GLESS
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id1849
      • name522_2290_2_PB_1.pdf
      • extensionpdf
      • filename522-2290-2-PB(1)
      • mimetypeapplication/pdf
      • md528ae2a3845139b4896821465f49deb40
      • typedocument
      • size182622
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(false)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created2015-12-16 13:43:05
      • modified2015-12-16 13:43:05
      • title
      • online(true)
  • 6(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1236
      • created2013-12-02 00:00:00
      • modified2015-11-17 11:45:47
      • publication_date2013-11-01 00:00:00
      • first_nameSamuli
      • last_nameMIETTINEN
      • occupationContact Point
      • institutionUniversity of Helsinki
      • addressPO Box 4
      • postal_codeFIN-00014
      • countryFI
      • telephone+358407319695
      • fax
      • emailsamuli.miettinen@helsinki.fi
      • titleImplied ancillary criminal law competence after Lisbon
      • authorSamuli MIETTINEN
      • co_author
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisherEuropean Criminal Law Review, 3(2)
      • pages194-219
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">Does the European Union have the competence to enact criminal law without relying on Article 83 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union? An analysis of documents from the Convention on the Future of Europe suggests the provision was intended to be both strictly interpreted and exhaustive. However, the opposite is implied by the Commission's choice of legal basis for a directive on the protection of the financial interests of the Union proposed in 2012. Its original legal basis also implies that the Union could eventually establish directly applicable criminal law. The 2012 proposal has proven nearly as controversial as its 2001-2002 predecessors. Nevertheless, analogous post-Lisbon case law from the Court of Justice of the European Union further supports a broad implied ancillary criminal law competence. This will cause difficulties in some Member States. Several common objections can be identified from a close reading of the Bundesverfassungsgericht Lisbon judgment. The concerns of the German Federal Constitutional Court could be taken into account by the Court of Justice if it selects a more nuanced approach when applying the choice of legal basis rules within the field of EU criminal law.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">The paper also links to two pending cases before the General Court, T-303/13 and T-395/13 which concern access to Council Legal Service opinions involved in the reserach.</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords(null)
      • slugimplied-ancillary-criminal-law-competence-after-lisbon
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id1412
      • full_nameSamuli MIETTINEN
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
• query(array)
  • page26
• meta(array)
  • titlePublications
• $request->data(empty)
• $this->validationErrors(array)
  • Menu(empty)
  • MenuLink(empty)
  • MenuLinkTranslation(empty)
  • AcademicProject(empty)
  • SearchDocument(empty)
  • Page(empty)
  • PageTranslation(empty)
  • EuLegislatoryDocument(empty)
  • PhdDocument(empty)
  • Newsletter(empty)
  • NewsletterTranslation(empty)
  • EuCaseLawDocument(empty)
  • Member(empty)
  • Event(empty)
  • EventTranslation(empty)
  • Publication(empty)
  • Link(empty)
  • LinkTranslation(empty)
  • Attachment(empty)
  • AttachmentTranslation(empty)
• Loaded Helpers(array)
  • 0Asset
  • 1Attachment
  • 2Html
  • 3Share
  • 4Form
  • 5Paginator
  • 6CookiesWarning
  • 7EventDates
  • 8Website
  • 9FormCrypt
  • 10Number
  • 11SimpleGraph
  • 12Menus
  • 13DebugTimer
  • 14Toolbar
  • 15Text
  • 16HtmlToolbar

App Constants

CakePHP Constants

PHP Environment

Included Files

Include Paths

• 1/usr/share/php
• 2-> /var/web/vd13792/ulb008_releases/20220919065337/cakephp/lib/Cake/

Included Files

• core(array)
  • Behavior(array)
    • 0CORE/Model/Behavior/ContainableBehavior.php
  • Cache(array)
    • 0CORE/Cache/Cache.php
    • 1CORE/Cache/Engine/FileEngine.php
    • 2CORE/Cache/CacheEngine.php
  • Component(array)
    • 0CORE/Controller/Component/PaginatorComponent.php
    • 1CORE/Controller/Component/SessionComponent.php
  • Config(array)
    • 0CORE/Config/config.php
  • Configure(array)
    • 0CORE/Configure/PhpReader.php
    • 1CORE/Configure/ConfigReaderInterface.php
  • Controller(array)
    • 0CORE/Controller/Controller.php
    • 1CORE/Controller/ComponentCollection.php
    • 2CORE/Controller/Component.php
  • Datasource(array)
    • 0CORE/Model/Datasource/CakeSession.php
    • 1CORE/Model/Datasource/Database/Mysql.php
    • 2CORE/Model/Datasource/DboSource.php
    • 3CORE/Model/Datasource/DataSource.php
  • Error(array)
    • 0CORE/Error/exceptions.php
    • 1CORE/Error/ErrorHandler.php
  • I18n(array)
    • 0CORE/I18n/I18n.php
    • 1CORE/I18n/L10n.php
  • Log(array)
    • 0CORE/Log/CakeLog.php
    • 1CORE/Log/LogEngineCollection.php
    • 2CORE/Log/Engine/FileLog.php
    • 3CORE/Log/Engine/BaseLog.php
    • 4CORE/Log/CakeLogInterface.php
  • Model(array)
    • 0CORE/Model/Model.php
    • 1CORE/Model/BehaviorCollection.php
    • 2CORE/Model/ConnectionManager.php
    • 3CORE/Model/ModelBehavior.php
  • Network(array)
    • 0CORE/Network/CakeRequest.php
    • 1CORE/Network/CakeResponse.php
  • Other(array)
    • 0CORE/bootstrap.php
    • 1CORE/basics.php
    • 2CORE/Core/App.php
    • 3CORE/Core/Configure.php
    • 4CORE/Core/CakePlugin.php
    • 5CORE/Event/CakeEventManager.php
    • 6CORE/Event/CakeEventListener.php
    • 7CORE/Event/CakeEvent.php
    • 8CORE/Core/CakeObject.php
  • Routing(array)
    • 0CORE/Routing/Dispatcher.php
    • 1CORE/Routing/Filter/AssetDispatcher.php
    • 2CORE/Routing/DispatcherFilter.php
    • 3CORE/Routing/Filter/CacheDispatcher.php
    • 4CORE/Routing/Router.php
    • 5CORE/Routing/Route/CakeRoute.php
  • Utility(array)
    • 0CORE/Utility/Hash.php
    • 1CORE/Utility/Debugger.php
    • 2CORE/Utility/CakeText.php
    • 3CORE/Utility/Inflector.php
    • 4CORE/Utility/ObjectCollection.php
    • 5CORE/Utility/ClassRegistry.php
  • View(array)
    • 0CORE/View/HelperCollection.php
• app(array)
  • Behavior(array)
    • 0APP/Model/Behavior/CachableBehavior.php
  • Config(array)
    • 0APP/Config/core.php
    • 1APP/Config/preview/bootstrap.php
    • 2APP/Config/bootstrap.php
    • 3APP/Config/languages.php
    • 4APP/Config/routes.php
    • 5APP/Config/database.php
    • 6APP/Config/preview/database.php
  • Controller(array)
    • 0APP/Controller/PublicationsController.php
    • 1APP/Controller/AppController.php
  • Model(array)
    • 0APP/Model/Menu.php
    • 1APP/Model/MenuLink.php
    • 2APP/Model/MenuLinkTranslation.php
    • 3APP/Model/AcademicProject.php
    • 4APP/Model/AppModel.php
    • 5APP/Model/Page.php
    • 6APP/Model/PageTranslation.php
    • 7APP/Model/EuLegislatoryDocument.php
    • 8APP/Model/PhdDocument.php
    • 9APP/Model/Newsletter.php
    • 10APP/Model/NewsletterTranslation.php
    • 11APP/Model/EuCaseLawDocument.php
    • 12APP/Model/Member.php
    • 13APP/Model/Event.php
    • 14APP/Model/EventTranslation.php
    • 15APP/Model/Publication.php
    • 16APP/Model/Link.php
    • 17APP/Model/LinkTranslation.php
    • 18APP/Model/Attachment.php
    • 19APP/Model/AttachmentTranslation.php
  • Other(array)
    • 0APP/mysqli-overwrites.php
    • 1APP/Entity/AppEntity.php
    • 2APP/Entity/EventEntity.php
• plugins(array)
  • BoostCake(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0BoostCake/Config/bootstrap.php
    • Component(array)
      • 0BoostCake/Controller/Component/BoostCakeComponent.php
  • CakeAdmin(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0CakeAdmin/Config/routes.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0CakeAdmin/Lib/Routing/Route/AdminRoute.php
      • 1CakeAdmin/Lib/AdminConfig.php
      • 2CakeAdmin/Lib/Routing/Route/AdminBelongsToRoute.php
  • Contact(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Contact/Config/routes.php
  • DebugKit(array)
    • Component(array)
      • 0DebugKit/Controller/Component/ToolbarComponent.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0DebugKit/Lib/DebugMemory.php
      • 1DebugKit/Lib/Panel/HistoryPanel.php
      • 2DebugKit/Lib/DebugPanel.php
      • 3DebugKit/Lib/Panel/SessionPanel.php
      • 4DebugKit/Lib/Panel/RequestPanel.php
      • 5DebugKit/Lib/Panel/SqlLogPanel.php
      • 6DebugKit/Lib/Panel/TimerPanel.php
      • 7DebugKit/Lib/Panel/LogPanel.php
      • 8DebugKit/Lib/Log/Engine/DebugKitLog.php
      • 9DebugKit/Lib/Panel/VariablesPanel.php
      • 10DebugKit/Lib/Panel/EnvironmentPanel.php
      • 11DebugKit/Lib/Panel/IncludePanel.php
      • 12DebugKit/Lib/DebugTimer.php
      • 13DebugKit/Lib/DebugKitDebugger.php
  • Event(array)
    • Model(array)
      • 0Event/Model/PluginEvent.php
      • 1Event/Model/EventAppModel.php
      • 2Event/Model/PluginEventTranslation.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Event/Entity/PluginEventEntity.php
  • MailingService(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0MailingService/Config/routes.php
  • Media(array)
    • Component(array)
      • 0Media/Controller/Component/UploadComponent.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0Media/Model/PluginAttachment.php
      • 1Media/Model/PluginAttachmentTranslation.php
      • 2Media/Model/MediaAppModel.php
  • Menu(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Menu/Config/bootstrap.php
    • Component(array)
      • 0Menu/Controller/Component/MenusComponent.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0Menu/Model/PluginMenu.php
      • 1Menu/Model/MenuAppModel.php
      • 2Menu/Model/PluginMenuLink.php
      • 3Menu/Model/PluginMenuLinkTranslation.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Menu/Lib/Tree.php
      • 1Menu/Lib/Vertex.php
  • Page(array)
    • Model(array)
      • 0Page/Model/PluginPage.php
      • 1Page/Model/PluginPageTranslation.php
  • Search(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Search/Config/routes.php
    • Behavior(array)
      • 0Search/Model/Behavior/SearchableBehavior.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0Search/Model/SearchDocument.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Search/Vendor/DoubleMetaPhone.php
  • Share(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Share/Config/routes.php
  • System(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0System/Config/bootstrap.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0System/Lib/I18n/Language.php
      • 1System/Lib/Routing/Resources.php
      • 2System/Lib/Routing/Route/I18nResourceRoute.php
      • 3System/Lib/Routing/Route/ResourceRoute.php
      • 4System/Entity/Entity.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0System/Model/EntityModel.php
    • Behavior(array)
      • 0System/Model/Behavior/TranslatableBehavior.php
      • 1System/Model/Behavior/ViewsBehavior.php
      • 2System/Model/Behavior/SluggableBehavior.php
  • Utils(array)
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Utils/Lib/Routing/Filter/MaintenanceFilter.php
    • Component(array)
      • 0Utils/Controller/Component/FormCryptComponent.php
    • Behavior(array)
      • 0Utils/Model/Behavior/ArchivableBehavior.php