Publications

Request History

No previous requests logged.

Session

• 0(null)

Request

Cake Params

• plugin(null)
• controllerpublications
• actionindex
• named(empty)
• pass(empty)
• localeen
• paging(array)
  • Publication(array)
    • page10
    • current7
    • count612
    • prevPage(true)
    • nextPage(true)
    • pageCount88
    • order(array)
      • Publication.publication_datedesc
    • limit7
    • options(array)
      • page10
    • paramTypequerystring
    • queryScope(null)

Post data

No post data.

Query string

• page10

Cookie

To view Cookies, add CookieComponent to Controller

Current Route

• name(null)
• _fields(empty)
• resourceActionindex
• modelPublication
• keys(array)
  • 0locale
• options(array)
  • pass(empty)
• defaults(array)
  • controllerpublications
  • actionindex
  • plugin(null)
• template/:locale/publications
• config(empty)

Sql Logs

Logs

View Variables

• menuNameCurrentMenuLinkmain
• title_for_layoutPublications
• publications(array)
  • 0(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1081
      • created2012-08-01 00:00:00
      • modified2015-12-16 13:04:24
      • publication_date2015-06-16 00:00:00
      • first_nameSabine
      • last_nameGLESS
      • occupationManagement Committee and Contact Point
      • institutionUniversity of Basel
      • addressPeter Merian-Weg 8 Postfach
      • postal_code4002
      • countrySwitzerland
      • telephone+41 (0)61 267 28 73
      • fax+41 (0)61 267 25 48
      • emailsabine.gless@unibas.ch
      • titleWater always finds its way - discretion and the concept of exclusionary rules in the Swiss Criminal Procedure Code
      • authorSabine GLESS
      • co_authorJeannine MARTIN in Michele CAIANIELLO and Jacqueline S. HODGSON (Eds.), Discretionary criminal justice in a comparative context"
      • publication_typecollective_book
      • journal_publisherDurham
      • pages159-184
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">When the Swiss Code of Criminal Procedure entered into force in January 2011, criminal proceedings -including the gathering and use of evidence and related exclusionary rules- became heavily regulated. This paper will analyse these exclusionary rules, both in theory and in practice.</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywordsadmissibility of evidence,evidence,exclusionary rules,switzerland
      • slugwater-always-finds-its-way-discretion-and-the-concept-of-exclusionary-rules-in-the-swiss-criminal-procedure-code
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id1239
      • full_nameSabine GLESS
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 1(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id836
      • created2013-09-11 00:00:00
      • modified2015-11-27 15:04:26
      • publication_date2015-06-01 00:00:00
      • first_namePaul
      • last_nameDE HERT
      • occupationContact Point
      • institutionVrije Univesiteit Brussel
      • addressPleinelaan 2
      • postal_code1050
      • countryBE
      • telephone+32(0)2 629 24 60
      • fax+32(0)2 629 36 33
      • emailpaul.de.hert@vub.ac.be
      • titleCooperation between the private sector and law enforcement agencies: an area in between legal regulations. In: Police Cooperation in the European Union under the Treaty of Lisbon. Opportunities and limitations
      • authorPaul DE HERT
      • co_authorGertjan BOULET in Hartmut ADEN (Ed.), "Police Cooperation in the European Union under the Treaty of Lisbon"
      • publication_typebook_chapter
      • journal_publisherNomos
      • pages245-258
      • abstractThis paper builds upon earlier work in which we identified, both at the EU and the international level, proposals for more cooperation between the private sector and law enforcement agencies (LEAs). The paper searches for legal provisions safeguarding citizen’s rights when confronted with these public-private collaborations. The contribution mainly focuses on data protection provisions. The main finding is that the area of cooperation between the private sector and LEAs strongly resembles an “area in between” regulations. 
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywordspolice cooperation,data protection,Treaty of Lisbon,law enforcement,private sector,transborder access,Europol
      • slugcooperation-between-the-private-sector-and-law-enforcement-agencies-an-area-in-between-legal-regulations-in-police-cooperation-in-the-european-union-under-the-treaty-of-lisbon-opportunities-and-limitations
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id1374
      • full_namePaul DE HERT
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 2(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1667
      • created2016-04-20 23:10:30
      • modified2016-04-20 23:10:37
      • publication_date2015-06-01 00:00:00
      • first_nameRoberto
      • last_nameKOSTORIS
      • occupationMember
      • institutionUniversity of Padova
      • address
      • postal_code
      • countryItaly
      • telephone0039 0498273376
      • fax
      • emailroberto.kostoris@unipd.it
      • titleA European Public Prosecutor Office against Eurofinancial Crimes: Which Future?
      • authorRoberto KOSTORIS
      • co_author
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisherJournal of Eastern European Criminal Law 2015 Issue 2
      • pages27
      • abstract<div class="labels" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; clear: both; color: rgb(17, 17, 17); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"> <div class="desc" style="margin: 0px 0px 20px; padding: 0px; width: 465px; float: left; text-align: justify;">The establishment of a European Public Prosecutor's Office for the fight against the crimes affecting the financial interests of the Union constitutes a complex and rough path. The article focuses on the fundamental steps of this route until now, from the provisions of the Treaty of Lisbon, to the Commission's proposal, to its redrafts, above all that one of April 2014 under the Greek Presidency. What emerges is a too complex and elephantine body, illsuited to an efficient fight against eurofinancial crimes. However, some slender lights seem to appear in the more recent developments of this path.</div> <div></div> </div>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords
      • sluga-european-public-prosecutor-office-against-eurofinancial-crimes-which-future
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameRoberto KOSTORIS
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 3(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1709
      • created2016-04-22 14:45:17
      • modified2016-04-23 15:46:01
      • publication_date2015-06-01 00:00:00
      • first_nameCeline
      • last_nameCOCQ
      • occupationMember
      • institutionULB-IEE
      • addressAv F. Roosevelt 39
      • postal_code1050, Bruxelles
      • countryBelgium
      • telephone0032 26506665
      • fax
      • emailcelicocq@ulb.ac.be
      • titleBelgium
      • authorCeline COCQ
      • co_authorAnne WEYEMBERGH in Kent ROACH (Ed.), "Comparative counter-terrorism law"
      • publication_typebook_chapter
      • journal_publisherCambridge University Press
      • pages234-268
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">Terrorism law is as international as it is regionally distinct and as difficult to define as it is essential to address. Given recent pressures to harmonize terrorism laws from international organizations like the United Nations Security Council, the Financial Action Task Force, and the Council of Europe, this book presents readers with an up-to-date assessment of terrorism law across the globe. Covering twenty-two jurisdictions across six continents, the common framework used for each chapter facilitates national comparisons of a range of laws including relevant criminal, administrative, financial, secrecy, and military laws. Recognizing that similar laws may yield different outcomes when transplanted into new contexts, priority of place is given to examples of real world application. Including a thematic introduction and conclusion, this book will help establish comparative counter-terrorism law as an emerging discipline crossing the boundaries of domestic and international law.</p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords
      • slugbelgium
      • attachment_id2061
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameCeline COCQ
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id2061
      • nameblob.
      • extension
      • filenameblob
      • mimetypeimage/png
      • md565ac16e3f12b3c1fcb6d619650fa4849
      • typeimage
      • size50296
      • width482
      • height174
      • protected(false)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created2016-04-22 14:43:26
      • modified2016-04-22 14:43:26
      • title
      • online(true)
  • 4(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1288
      • created2015-10-23 14:47:09
      • modified2015-11-17 11:45:47
      • publication_date2015-05-01 00:00:00
      • first_nameFlorin
      • last_nameSTRETEANU
      • occupationContact Point
      • institutionUniversity of Cluj-Napoca
      • addressAvram Iancu Street 11
      • postal_code400089, Cluj-Nap
      • countryRO
      • telephone
      • fax
      • emailsflorin@law.ubbcluj.ro
      • titleVers un modèle européen de responsabilité pénale des personnes morales
      • authorFlorin STRETEANU in Collective book, "Europe(s), droit(s) européen(s) : une passion d'universitaire Liber amicorum en l'honneur du professeur Vlad Constantinesco"
      • co_author
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisherBruylant
      • pages887-897
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">Ce Liber Amicorum Vlad Constantinesco réunit en un recueil plus de 35 contributions provenant d’universitaires d’une douzaine d’États membres de l’Union européenne. Il s’agit d’un hommage rendu par ses collègues qui, à de multiples titres, ont eu, au cours de sa carrière, le plaisir d’écrire avec lui, de faire leur thèse sous sa direction, de l’inviter à des cours et conférences ou encore de le côtoyer notamment à l’Université de Strasbourg dans laquelle s’est déroulée la majeure partie de sa carrière universitaire. Sa curiosité intellectuelle, l’étendue de ses champs de recherche et de réflexion ainsi que ses profondes connaissances linguistiques ont amené le professeur Constantinesco à enseigner dans de nombreux pays et universités. Ces contributions portent principalement sur le droit de l’Union, mais également sur les droits de l’homme, le droit constitutionnel, le droit comparé et enfin les rapports entre les ordres juridiques. Elles rendent compte principalement de l’actualité de l’Union à travers des problématiques institutionnelles, contentieuses, et d’articulation juridique.</p>
      • languagesFrench
      • keywords(null)
      • slugvers-un-modele-europeen-de-responsabilite-penale-des-personnes-morales
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id(null)
      • full_nameFlorin STRETEANU
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 5(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id1255
      • created2015-01-08 00:00:00
      • modified2015-11-17 11:45:47
      • publication_date2015-04-27 00:00:00
      • first_nameValsamis
      • last_nameMITSILEGAS
      • occupationCoordinator
      • institutionQueen Mary University
      • addressMile End Road 339
      • postal_codeE1 4NS
      • countryGB
      • telephone+44(0) 2078825132
      • fax+44(0)2089818733
      • emailv.mitsilegas@qmul.ac.uk
      • titleThe Criminalisation of Migration in Europe. Challenges for Human Rights and the Rule of Law
      • authorValsamis MITSILEGAS
      • co_author
      • publication_typebook
      • journal_publisherSpringer
      • pages110
      • abstractThis is the first monograph providing a comprehensive legal analysis of the criminalisation of migration in Europe. The book puts forward a definition of the criminalisation of migration as the three-fold process whereby migration management takes place via the adoption of substantive criminal law, via recourse to traditional criminal law enforcement mechanisms including surveillance and detention, and via the development of mechanisms of prevention and pre-emption. The book provides a typology of criminalisation of migration, structured on the basis of the three stages of the migrant experience: criminalisation before entry (examining criminalisation in the context of extraterritorial immigration control, delegation and privatisation in immigration control and the securitisation of migration); criminalisation during stay (examining how substantive criminal law is used to regulate migration in the territory); and criminalisation after entry and towards removal (examining efforts to exclude and remove migrants from the territory and jurisdiction of EU Member States and criminalisation through detention). The analysis focuses on the impact of the criminalisation of migration on human rights and the rule of law, and it highlights how European Union law (through the application of both the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and general principles of EU law) and ECHR law may contribute towards achieving decriminalisation of migration in Europe.
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords(null)
      • slugthe-criminalisation-of-migration-in-europe-challenges-for-human-rights-and-the-rule-of-law
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id1434
      • full_nameValsamis MITSILEGAS
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
  • 6(array)
    • Publication(array)
      • id777
      • created2007-08-02 00:00:00
      • modified2015-11-17 11:45:47
      • publication_date2015-04-10 00:00:00
      • first_nameSamuli
      • last_nameMIETTINEN
      • occupationContact Point
      • institutionUniversity of Helsinki
      • addressPO Box 4
      • postal_codeFIN-00014
      • countryFI
      • telephone+358407319695
      • fax
      • emailsamuli.miettinen@helsinki.fi
      • titleThe Europeanization of Criminal Law: Competence and its Control in the Lisbon Era
      • authorSamuli MIETTINEN
      • co_author
      • publication_typearticle
      • journal_publisherUniversity of Helsinki, Faculty of Law
      • pages509
      • abstract<p style="text-align: justify;">How is EU criminal legislative competence regulated after the Lisbon Treaty? The European Union has always had powers which affect national criminal law. Classic internal market judgments consider whether national criminal law measures are justified restrictions of freedom of movement. The Union s direct legislative powers in this field have developed more slowly through international agreements, Treaty revision and the case law of the Court of Justice on implied powers. This study asks what powers have been conferred on the Union in the field of substantive criminal law and how the exercise of its powers may be reviewed after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty. The questions raise a wide range of issues relevant to EU criminal law, but also to EU constitutional, administrative and institutional law.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">A state-centric view of European integration holds that EU criminal law powers were framed to preserve core areas of national sovereignty. Scholarship in the field of EU criminal law is often ambivalent or critical of centralized powers in this field. Addressing the Union s competence creep was at the heart of constitutional reforms incorporated by the Lisbon Treaty. This sentiment explains some unusual features of the field after those revisions: the emergency brake , the special position of the UK, Ireland and Denmark, limits to Court of Justice jurisdiction, the unanimity requirement for states participating in the European Public Prosecutor s office, more sensitive ex ante subsidiarity control, and limiting express criminal law powers to directives. Nevertheless, these limits are constructed from the reference point of EU institutional law. The survey of those elements shows that the foundations of these structures are unreliable. If codification was intended to limit creeping competence , the framers have failed. Case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union after December 2009 suggests that Article 83 TFEU, or even the complete set of legal bases in the Union s area of freedom, security and justice , is not an exhaustive codification of the Union s criminal law powers. The central question in the calculus, the Court s rules on choice of legal bases , has been susceptible to creative drafting and suffers from weak judicial oversight. Legislative practice suggests that the new safeguards can be sidelined in this process. Thus, the central, and important debates in EU criminal law on the meaning of specific concepts like minimum rules , what crimes can be included in the 83(1) list, and how the European Public Prosecutor should operate may be gradually sidelined by the incoming tide , or at least creeping competence in other estuaries. At the same time, Member States cling to pre-Lisbon practices that restrict the exercise of competence but which seem disconnected from the post-Lisbon legal framework. A detailed examination of this field finds anomalies in the external relations law of the Union, where pragmatism prevails. Small elements that have criminal law implications may be included within Union powers where express internal competence is doubtful. In others, declarations of competence appear to reserve powers to the Member States that the Union could lawfully exercise.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">The Court now accepts ancillary provisions with criminal law relevance in mainstream measures that do not offer the safeguards of the express criminal law provisions. This is demonstrated by analogy with the case law on issues in the area of freedom, security and justice . Thus, social security coordination measures can be based on the free movement provisions, criminal law obligations may be part of the common commercial policy, and agreements on the treatment of suspected pirates may properly be concluded as part of an agreement that is exclusively Common Foreign and Security Policy. The Court even allows the EU legislature to predetermine the success of any legal challenge because it relies primarily on textual evidence in recitals to determine the aim of the legislature. Thus, measures establishing information systems and exchange mechanisms concerning road traffic offences are measures of transport policy, not measures concerning cooperation in criminal matters, and data retention is an internal market measure. These judgments have surprised academics, national governments, and even EU institutions legal services. Questions also arise as to the effectiveness of the new safeguards even when they are not circumvented. The emergency brake may lead to consensualism, but it is not pulled when a Member State position that is presented as a red line is ignored. The pleadings of the opt-out states in key cases suggest that national governments are not policing their opt-out. National parliaments rarely raise formal subsidiarity concerns. Intervention is rare even if an EU proposal raises constitutional issues and overrules significant policy choices in national criminal law.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">National policy choices may be legitimate even if the Union has the technical capacity to overrule them. National criminal law scholars often argue that integration in criminal law will come at a high personal cost to the victims of that policy unless appropriate safeguards are developed. The Court of Justice has struggled to distinguish between criminal and civil rules in the European Union constitutional system. Instead, it has developed institutional safeguards that require, as far as possible, democratic decision-making. It has also begun to use fundamental rights, and in particular the Charter of Fundamental Rights, to test the legality of Union action. Thus, whilst its standard of review has been criticized in the past, the findings suggest the Court may be better placed to cope with the increasing trend to treat de facto penal law as administrative rules than the corpus of EU judicial review literature suggests.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">This research has used standard legal research methods but combines these with an element of the law in action in the field of EU transparency law. During the research, it became clear that the key research questions required material that had not been published. In order to study the drafting processes, the study sought and obtained series of documents that were not originally released for public use. These include legislative negotiation documents, legal opinions of the legal services, and even the pleadings of Member States and EU institutions in key constitutional law cases. One document was released through litigation; another is pending litigation. Both cases raise novel points in transparency law that may have wide-reaching consequences on the nature of the EU criminal legislative process. To what extent should it be open to public scrutiny?</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">Should the Union consider strictly defined conferral or procedural limits to the enumerated powers? The history of constitutional limits is that they are circumvented at the first opportunity when a crisis presents itself. It is possible to conceive some which are more difficult to ignore than those which appear to have buckled under the strain of post-Lisbon practice. However, when limits are drafted in a strict form, this can later cause constitutional contortions that call into question the rule of law. Instead, the present criminal competence control has been effectively proceduralized: particular steps must be taken, but their review is likely to be unintrusive or sympathetic. More legal research is required in the pre-legislative stage, even to understand the nature of competence control. Debates in poorly studied legislative forums are likely to shed great light on the Union s constitution: what happens .<br />  </p>
      • languagesEnglish
      • keywords(null)
      • slugthe-europeanization-of-criminal-law-competence-and-its-control-in-the-lisbon-era
      • attachment_id(null)
      • approved(true)
      • online(true)
      • old_id919
      • full_nameSamuli MIETTINEN
      • approved_online1
    • Attachment(array)
      • id(null)
      • name(null)
      • extension(null)
      • filename(null)
      • mimetype(null)
      • md5(null)
      • type(null)
      • size(null)
      • width(null)
      • height(null)
      • protected(null)
      • old_media_id(null)
      • created(null)
      • modified(null)
      • title(null)
      • online(null)
• query(array)
  • page10
• meta(array)
  • titlePublications
• $request->data(empty)
• $this->validationErrors(array)
  • Menu(empty)
  • MenuLink(empty)
  • MenuLinkTranslation(empty)
  • AcademicProject(empty)
  • SearchDocument(empty)
  • Page(empty)
  • PageTranslation(empty)
  • EuLegislatoryDocument(empty)
  • PhdDocument(empty)
  • EuCaseLawDocument(empty)
  • Newsletter(empty)
  • NewsletterTranslation(empty)
  • Member(empty)
  • Event(empty)
  • EventTranslation(empty)
  • Publication(empty)
  • Link(empty)
  • LinkTranslation(empty)
  • Attachment(empty)
  • AttachmentTranslation(empty)
• Loaded Helpers(array)
  • 0Asset
  • 1Attachment
  • 2Html
  • 3Share
  • 4Form
  • 5Paginator
  • 6CookiesWarning
  • 7EventDates
  • 8Website
  • 9FormCrypt
  • 10Number
  • 11SimpleGraph
  • 12Menus
  • 13DebugTimer
  • 14Toolbar
  • 15Text
  • 16HtmlToolbar

App Constants

CakePHP Constants

PHP Environment

Included Files

Include Paths

• 1/usr/share/php
• 2-> /var/web/vd13792/ulb008_releases/20220919065337/cakephp/lib/Cake/

Included Files

• core(array)
  • Behavior(array)
    • 0CORE/Model/Behavior/ContainableBehavior.php
  • Cache(array)
    • 0CORE/Cache/Cache.php
    • 1CORE/Cache/Engine/FileEngine.php
    • 2CORE/Cache/CacheEngine.php
  • Component(array)
    • 0CORE/Controller/Component/PaginatorComponent.php
    • 1CORE/Controller/Component/SessionComponent.php
  • Config(array)
    • 0CORE/Config/config.php
  • Configure(array)
    • 0CORE/Configure/PhpReader.php
    • 1CORE/Configure/ConfigReaderInterface.php
  • Controller(array)
    • 0CORE/Controller/Controller.php
    • 1CORE/Controller/ComponentCollection.php
    • 2CORE/Controller/Component.php
  • Datasource(array)
    • 0CORE/Model/Datasource/CakeSession.php
    • 1CORE/Model/Datasource/Database/Mysql.php
    • 2CORE/Model/Datasource/DboSource.php
    • 3CORE/Model/Datasource/DataSource.php
  • Error(array)
    • 0CORE/Error/exceptions.php
    • 1CORE/Error/ErrorHandler.php
  • I18n(array)
    • 0CORE/I18n/I18n.php
    • 1CORE/I18n/L10n.php
  • Log(array)
    • 0CORE/Log/CakeLog.php
    • 1CORE/Log/LogEngineCollection.php
    • 2CORE/Log/Engine/FileLog.php
    • 3CORE/Log/Engine/BaseLog.php
    • 4CORE/Log/CakeLogInterface.php
  • Model(array)
    • 0CORE/Model/Model.php
    • 1CORE/Model/BehaviorCollection.php
    • 2CORE/Model/ConnectionManager.php
    • 3CORE/Model/ModelBehavior.php
  • Network(array)
    • 0CORE/Network/CakeRequest.php
    • 1CORE/Network/CakeResponse.php
  • Other(array)
    • 0CORE/bootstrap.php
    • 1CORE/basics.php
    • 2CORE/Core/App.php
    • 3CORE/Core/Configure.php
    • 4CORE/Core/CakePlugin.php
    • 5CORE/Event/CakeEventManager.php
    • 6CORE/Event/CakeEventListener.php
    • 7CORE/Event/CakeEvent.php
    • 8CORE/Core/CakeObject.php
  • Routing(array)
    • 0CORE/Routing/Dispatcher.php
    • 1CORE/Routing/Filter/AssetDispatcher.php
    • 2CORE/Routing/DispatcherFilter.php
    • 3CORE/Routing/Filter/CacheDispatcher.php
    • 4CORE/Routing/Router.php
    • 5CORE/Routing/Route/CakeRoute.php
  • Utility(array)
    • 0CORE/Utility/Hash.php
    • 1CORE/Utility/Debugger.php
    • 2CORE/Utility/CakeText.php
    • 3CORE/Utility/Inflector.php
    • 4CORE/Utility/ObjectCollection.php
    • 5CORE/Utility/ClassRegistry.php
  • View(array)
    • 0CORE/View/HelperCollection.php
• app(array)
  • Behavior(array)
    • 0APP/Model/Behavior/CachableBehavior.php
  • Config(array)
    • 0APP/Config/core.php
    • 1APP/Config/preview/bootstrap.php
    • 2APP/Config/bootstrap.php
    • 3APP/Config/languages.php
    • 4APP/Config/routes.php
    • 5APP/Config/database.php
    • 6APP/Config/preview/database.php
  • Controller(array)
    • 0APP/Controller/PublicationsController.php
    • 1APP/Controller/AppController.php
  • Model(array)
    • 0APP/Model/Menu.php
    • 1APP/Model/MenuLink.php
    • 2APP/Model/MenuLinkTranslation.php
    • 3APP/Model/AcademicProject.php
    • 4APP/Model/AppModel.php
    • 5APP/Model/Page.php
    • 6APP/Model/PageTranslation.php
    • 7APP/Model/EuLegislatoryDocument.php
    • 8APP/Model/PhdDocument.php
    • 9APP/Model/EuCaseLawDocument.php
    • 10APP/Model/Newsletter.php
    • 11APP/Model/NewsletterTranslation.php
    • 12APP/Model/Member.php
    • 13APP/Model/Event.php
    • 14APP/Model/EventTranslation.php
    • 15APP/Model/Publication.php
    • 16APP/Model/Link.php
    • 17APP/Model/LinkTranslation.php
    • 18APP/Model/Attachment.php
    • 19APP/Model/AttachmentTranslation.php
  • Other(array)
    • 0APP/mysqli-overwrites.php
    • 1APP/Entity/AppEntity.php
    • 2APP/Entity/EventEntity.php
• plugins(array)
  • BoostCake(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0BoostCake/Config/bootstrap.php
    • Component(array)
      • 0BoostCake/Controller/Component/BoostCakeComponent.php
  • CakeAdmin(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0CakeAdmin/Config/routes.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0CakeAdmin/Lib/Routing/Route/AdminRoute.php
      • 1CakeAdmin/Lib/AdminConfig.php
      • 2CakeAdmin/Lib/Routing/Route/AdminBelongsToRoute.php
  • Contact(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Contact/Config/routes.php
  • DebugKit(array)
    • Component(array)
      • 0DebugKit/Controller/Component/ToolbarComponent.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0DebugKit/Lib/DebugMemory.php
      • 1DebugKit/Lib/Panel/HistoryPanel.php
      • 2DebugKit/Lib/DebugPanel.php
      • 3DebugKit/Lib/Panel/SessionPanel.php
      • 4DebugKit/Lib/Panel/RequestPanel.php
      • 5DebugKit/Lib/Panel/SqlLogPanel.php
      • 6DebugKit/Lib/Panel/TimerPanel.php
      • 7DebugKit/Lib/Panel/LogPanel.php
      • 8DebugKit/Lib/Log/Engine/DebugKitLog.php
      • 9DebugKit/Lib/Panel/VariablesPanel.php
      • 10DebugKit/Lib/Panel/EnvironmentPanel.php
      • 11DebugKit/Lib/Panel/IncludePanel.php
      • 12DebugKit/Lib/DebugTimer.php
      • 13DebugKit/Lib/DebugKitDebugger.php
  • Event(array)
    • Model(array)
      • 0Event/Model/PluginEvent.php
      • 1Event/Model/EventAppModel.php
      • 2Event/Model/PluginEventTranslation.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Event/Entity/PluginEventEntity.php
  • MailingService(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0MailingService/Config/routes.php
  • Media(array)
    • Component(array)
      • 0Media/Controller/Component/UploadComponent.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0Media/Model/PluginAttachment.php
      • 1Media/Model/PluginAttachmentTranslation.php
      • 2Media/Model/MediaAppModel.php
  • Menu(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Menu/Config/bootstrap.php
    • Component(array)
      • 0Menu/Controller/Component/MenusComponent.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0Menu/Model/PluginMenu.php
      • 1Menu/Model/MenuAppModel.php
      • 2Menu/Model/PluginMenuLink.php
      • 3Menu/Model/PluginMenuLinkTranslation.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Menu/Lib/Tree.php
      • 1Menu/Lib/Vertex.php
  • Page(array)
    • Model(array)
      • 0Page/Model/PluginPage.php
      • 1Page/Model/PluginPageTranslation.php
  • Search(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Search/Config/routes.php
    • Behavior(array)
      • 0Search/Model/Behavior/SearchableBehavior.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0Search/Model/SearchDocument.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Search/Vendor/DoubleMetaPhone.php
  • Share(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0Share/Config/routes.php
  • System(array)
    • Config(array)
      • 0System/Config/bootstrap.php
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0System/Lib/I18n/Language.php
      • 1System/Lib/Routing/Resources.php
      • 2System/Lib/Routing/Route/I18nResourceRoute.php
      • 3System/Lib/Routing/Route/ResourceRoute.php
      • 4System/Entity/Entity.php
    • Model(array)
      • 0System/Model/EntityModel.php
    • Behavior(array)
      • 0System/Model/Behavior/TranslatableBehavior.php
      • 1System/Model/Behavior/ViewsBehavior.php
      • 2System/Model/Behavior/SluggableBehavior.php
  • Utils(array)
    • Plugin(array)
      • 0Utils/Lib/Routing/Filter/MaintenanceFilter.php
    • Component(array)
      • 0Utils/Controller/Component/FormCryptComponent.php
    • Behavior(array)
      • 0Utils/Model/Behavior/ArchivableBehavior.php